Simply, did you mean being a healer is not fun at all? ^^;
This is a super big difference, now every great tank has to use STR instead of VIT but healers never use INT instead of MND.
Suppose what base of VIT means STR is no more a concern to tanks. just like INT not a concern to healers.
So it is helping the tanks but not nerfing them! ^^;
I see. Sorry I read "that isn't fun quite often for me" then "Now I find it to be a lot less fun than it used to be." so I got you wrong. ^^;
By the way, when I have a tank sit in aoe during big pull, I give-up DPS and just force him alive.
Sometime I think is this guy want to wipe in the first pull then give reason to rage quit for the undesired roulette dungeon?
But I am sorry, as a healer, I don't let him die ^^;
You're misunderstanding the situation I was talking about. It wasn't a tank that is regularly standing in AoEs, but rather one that does so right after I toggle Cleric Stance on (whether it's because of lag, not paying attention, or whatever). If I've got a tank that's doing so regularly, of course I stop trying to use Cleric Stance.
Forcing tanks to wear Vit was more of a buff to healers than to tanks.
If want cleric stance altered too, that's just being greedy! :P kidding
As it stands, healers already do more damage in certain situations than actual dps. If gonna make cleric stance obsolete, then lets just make plds have all oaths at the same time, wars have defiance/deliverance both at once, and darks can just well have the grit penalty removed I guess?
But this was never about having someone trying to make sense about things right? :P
that is not compareable because even if they remove cleric stance you can't make damage and heal at the same time because of the global cooldown. a tank on the other hand can deal damage and can tank the monsters at the same time, because tanking is not restricted by the gcd and you do both anyway at the same time anyway.
next time try to make sense about things please