Can we please get a dev comment about servers being full?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fiosha_Maureiba

Dude! You've been there like twelve hours today.

---

Maybe Bayohne's breaking the EULA and sharing logins. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVedis

um, you do realize you could apply for transfer now, and take it back ANY TIME YOU WANT before the 12th(i think it was the 12th) in case your friends dont make it in time right? no reason for you all to hold off until you can all do it at the exact same time

---

No, but thats handy to know. I just checked and it told me only 2 worlds have limited space now, and all but Ragnarok was closed lol. What a complete mess. It wouldnt Irk me as much if it wasnt for the fact that we know perfectly well there is way more space on these servers than what they have it capped at now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fiosha_Maureiba

Wait... are these Playstation buttons?
*unlocks the way to always transfer*

---

Not really. It's the Japanese marking system, "O" for correct, "X" for false, "△" for partially correct. Sony just applied it for their console, that's why in Japanese games you confirm with "O" and cancel with "X" /uselesstrivia

this is several pages old, but my idea was if each server has a cap with room to move then it is impossible to reach the cap on all 10 worlds at once. The counter argument was then said if the cap on the new world is say 3k and world A=1.6k and B = 1.6k and A + B => new world then its possible to cap out the new world, I agree this is possible but I must ask:

WHY THE FU-- WOULD SE CAP A WORLD AT LESS THEN WHAT IS ASSUMED TO HAPPEN IF NO MERGERS WERE TO TAKE PLACE?

You are guaranteed the merge through "default world merge" option so why would u cap it at less then the default? that is ass-backwords to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tachi

this is several pages old, but my idea was if each server has a cap with room to move then it is impossible to reach the cap on all 10 worlds at once. The counter argument was then said if the cap on the new world is say 3k and world A=1.6k and B = 1.6k and A + B => new world then its possible to cap out the new world, I agree this is possible but I must ask:

WHY THE FU-- WOULD SE CAP A WORLD AT LESS THEN WHAT IS ASSUMED TO HAPPEN IF NO MERGERS WERE TO TAKE PLACE?

You are guaranteed the merge through "default world merge" option so why would u cap it at less then the default? that is ass-backwords to me.

---

Tachi stop leaving your baby at the keyboard she's cute I know but sometimes she rages on the forums.

I could care less about the system they use, I'm happy that my friends who stopped playing for 2.0 are going to be able to join me on the new default server when they return. I wanted to stay on the default "Durandal". I just dont' understand the math of the situation it just seems so illogical to cap like:
A+B= C - (200) rather then
A+B= C + (200)

Edit: hey fatcat! you should stop by this weekend to do a SB with me =)

double edit: I'm just bored at work and there is no new stat threads to ponder over so i'm stuck in the hole that is general discussion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tachi

hey fatcat! you should stop by this weekend to do a SB with me =)

---

K! Let me know when to log on, goodness knows I need PIE materia anyways

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ookami

I think that one of the problem was that a large part of players assumed that ragnarok will become an EU server although EU players are not enough to fill it by half and a part of them will not move on ragnarok...

Too bad, maybe only half of EU players will move...it won't free a lot of slots...

---

I'm sure the total EU population could fill Ragnarok, it's just many probably most of them don't want to go there.

SE should have waited til 2.0 to make an EU server for new players and then opened it up for transfers later down the road.

Not knowing that SE would have the transfer cap that I believe option 4 would have had its own concerns such as a current server populations looking for a way to stay together, then reach an unexpected transfer cap, get split up, and scrambling to find a way to stay together.

I think that would have upset more people, even the active, who couldn't get into their server of choice (i.e. Server 1 and 2 capping as fast as the Supply and Provisioning missions cap, forcing those who did not get in to come up with backup plans that affect the remaining 8 realms).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kraggy

Maybe Bayohne's breaking the EULA and sharing logins. ;)

---

What fluffy beast would dare?! Speaking of fluffy beasts, will Camate change his avatar to something more intimidating and feral?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Soukyuu

Not really. It's the Japanese marking system, "O" for correct, "X" for false, "△" for partially correct. Sony just applied it for their console, that's why in Japanese games you confirm with "O" and cancel with "X" /uselesstrivia

---

I've never thought about it like that. It's neat! I kinda got used to it for some of the games (FFT, Tear Ring Saga, Langrisser, etc.), but now that I think about it, haven't touched the layout for years.

updating fairly fast it seems. Faster than I thought at least. within ~10 minutes (before post time) the page went from showing all servers full but Ragnarok to Durandal + Ridill with △ (again) to only Ridill with △ and now all servers are full again but Ragnarok.