This is why you're not justified in being so angry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frostmagemari

Because you argued that it's not "my two cents" and was rather "my two sense". Just accept that you got the phrase wrong and be done with it. Trying to claim a high ground after being proven wrong makes you sound petty.

Anyway, that's just my two cents, and i'll give you a third for your thoughts.

---

Lol because I didn't. It was intentional.

You are either:

1) Being overly analytical

or

2) Unintentionally thickheaded

My 2 sense.

And also its MY saying you can't have it:p

Actually you can I really don't care that much.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Imapooonu

And also its MY saying you can't have it:p

Actually you can I really don't care that much.

---

"Totally meant to do it" is the "lag" of 20 years ago. No one believes you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atheena

I mean why put soo much depth in DOL/DOH and make it a 2nd class citizen?

---

This, along with class/job changes and the introduction of average item level feature made me hate 2.1.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ri_ri

Stop talking about other people's money, it's just pathetic.
If you think you're getting enough for 15$ monthly, great. Some don't, and it's their right to voice their opinions.

---

You mean it's their right to look foolish, which I whole heartily agree with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bufkus

You mean it's their right to look foolish, which I whole heartily agree with.

---

What's so foolish about being dissatisfied with a game that clearly has issues?

Glad I'm not the only player who thinks it's baffling that they give you the ability to change into anything on one character, but in the end you can only gear up two battle classes from the high end dungeons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frostmagemari

snip

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peptaru

snip

---

I appreciate the effort, I really do. However, you two lack shtick. You can’t be so blatant in the “illusionary obliviousness” of the ninja troll so to speak. It’s bad form.

Proper form is when you don’t necessarily go out of your way when trying to prove the irrelevant relevancy of it all. You have to develop some sort of staying power without having that impression being one left of obnoxious insulting (not saying you two are there yet).

The easiest way to do this is to not leave a rebuttal for the victim. In this case the “ya it was intentional” is an effortless response to a not very well thought out “hidden troll attempt”.

If it wasn’t clever at all (not saying it’s the most brilliant catch line/saying/ugh….idiom I’ve ever came up with), most who read it wouldn't get it. Therein lays the problem. You need to back someone into a corner proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that they made a mistake. This is far too easy of an out for me, hence why there is no “shtick” for you.

In end I’ll leave you with this. The best trolls are the ones who are not so transparent and also non-malicious with a sort of “lol that’s clever” sort of ring to it. It almost leaves the victim in a state of being honored. Once you cross that redline, you’re then one comment away from just spewing out racist terms (again not saying you’re there yet).

Just figured you two could use some pointers.

My 2 sense.

How many threads can there be relating the sub to something else?

I'm not sure if your serious of not OP. I agree with your point, but it has been made many times before.

I should also point out the good ones don't break the ToS agreement either, which you two didn't do. So good on ya for that ;)