Post your Shadowbringers benchmark results

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9700K CPU @ 3.60GHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti(VRAM 11049 MB)
https://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV


Screen Size: 5760x1200- How I usually play (NVidia Surround 4tw)

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Shadowbringers Benchmark
Tested on: 5/25/2019 17:08:47
Score: 12692
Average Frame Rate: 85.66753
Minimum Frame Rate: 41
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.443 sec
Scene #2 3.371 sec
Scene #3 3.863 sec
Scene #4 2.63 sec
Scene #5 1.366 sec
Total Loading Time 12.673 sec


1920x1200

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Shadowbringers Benchmark
Tested on: 5/25/2019 17:16:27
Score: 17877
Average Frame Rate: 143.25
Minimum Frame Rate: 59
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.433 sec
Scene #2 3.32 sec
Scene #3 3.955 sec
Scene #4 2.657 sec
Scene #5 1.376 sec
Total Loading Time 12.741 sec

I got a 2.5K - fairly high. Hmm, maybe I should start gearing up a new gaming laptop.

https://www.pixenli.com/image/hwpKmwYY
load time was 25,737 sec,could be better if i put the benchmark on a SSD but i didnt bother

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ramesses

Here's one running from my other PC last night with the AMD Ryzen ... later on I'll post up the results from my PC with the Intel i9

---

Just out of interest, are you OC'ing your Ryzen? I've got one myself but I haven't really tinkered with OC settings, just curious if it makes any noticable difference to your score.

https://www.pixenli.com/miniature/i2UXwgPK

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Shadowbringers Benchmark
Tested on: 5/25/2019 9:53:03
Score: 10120
Average Frame Rate: 67.95313
Minimum Frame Rate: 23
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.229 sec
Scene #2 4.679 sec
Scene #3 4.962 sec
Scene #4 3.104 sec
Scene #5 1.745 sec
Total Loading Time 16.719 sec

DAT:s20190525095303.dat

Screen Size: 3840x2160
Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Preset 1
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Enabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Parallax Occlusion: High
-Tessellation: High
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Enabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: Strong
-Glare: Normal
-Water Refraction: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled

System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (ver.10.0.17763 Build 17763)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
32705.305MB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080(VRAM 8010 MB)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JackHatchet

-waits for all the hardcore streamers to show up with their editing PCs to brag about their high numbers-

---

and in the end...we all get the same crap textures like rabuan and hien outfits

Anyone has had this problem:

Score: 8588
Average Frame Rate: 0
Minimum Frame Rate: 35
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2,561 sec
Scene #2 4,095 sec
Scene #3 4,838 sec
Scene #4 3,42 sec
Scene #5 1,573 sec
Total Loading Time 16,487 sec

Average frame rate 0? I don't think so. Tried running it in several different modes, I always get 0.

My specs:

Score: 8588 Extremely High
2560x1440 Maximum DirectX11 Full Screen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070(VRAM 8031 MB)

Another thing of note: I noticed that when I had G-synch disabled, the score went way up, like almost 6k difference. Is that normal?

And for probably king of the low end:

A4-5050 (ASrock QC5000M Embedded mobo/cpu) 8gb (2gb for vid)

also swapped in a few video cards to that pc to see the scaling:

422 - A4-5050 (2gb system ram)
1901 - AMD HD 7770 (1gb vram)
3108 - AMD RX 560 (4gb vram)

The Avatar is on his knees for the 422 result, shaking his head and face palming.
standing but shaking head for the 1901 result.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dagget

And for probably king of the low end:

A4-5050 (ASrock QC5000M Embedded mobo/cpu) 8gb (2gb for vid)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B1l...ew?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B1l...ew?usp=sharing

also swapped in a few video cards to that pc to see the scaling:

422 - A4-5050 (2gb system ram)
1901 - AMD HD 7770 (1gb vram)
3108 - AMD RX 560 (4gb vram)

The Avatar is on his knees for the 422 result, shaking his head and face palming.
standing but shaking head for the 1901 result.

---

Now you make me want to run it on my spare room PC. For science!

https://i.imgur.com/NKEjGIS.png


Impacts score I'm sure - 2 monitors @ 75hz, Freesynced.