[Dev1008] Makeshift Jumping Implementation Poll

What resources? They are working on the game regardless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BloodLotus

It's not just about the people.

It's about the resources.

---

its about both
and they really unreasonable people posting dont realize or care about that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wilhelmina

What resources? They are working on the game regardless.

---

people = resources
money = resources

there are several ways to define it when it comes to game development

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVedis

people = resources
money = resources

there are several ways to define it when it comes to game development

---

Also:

Memory = Resources.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVedis

people = resources
money = resources

there are several ways to define it when it comes to game development

---

Ok granted, this is absolutely correct.

I'm trying to tie in their "risk assessment" statement. I believe that they will consider what will get them the best outcome for the use of the resources they have available.

Between Jump and Chocobos which would bring in more subscribers?
Jump and Story Quests?

And continue on like that, jump will remain on the back burner until most of what people want becomes implemented. By that point people may be happy with the game and jump won't even need to be considered.

I think I lost where I was going with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BloodLotus

Ok granted, this is absolutely correct.

I'm trying to tie in their "risk assessment" statement. I believe that they will consider what will get them the best outcome for the use of the resources they have available.

Between Jump and Chocobos which would bring in more subscribers?
Jump and Story Quests?

And continue on like that, jump will remain on the back burner until most of what people want becomes implemented. By that point people may be happy with the game and jump won't even need to be considered.

I think I lost where I was going with that.

---

yeah and thats why its low priority
and will stay low priority

there are so many things that will need to come first

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leeloo

Yes, I understand the 2 different jumping options. But if one wanted to look at the poll as pro-jump vs anti-jump they simply need to add the 2 jump votes together. Makes sense to me...

---

Then again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."

Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.

It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVedis

Jump is coming, period, regardless of what anti jump people want

---

:( I'm sorry, but someone misinformed you or perhaps you misunderstood something.
Jumping may or may not be implemented after testing and risk analysis.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nabiri

Then again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."

Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.

It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.

---

How is voting for an option that reads

Quote:

---

Like if you WANT jumping Limited

---

= not being for jump?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nabiri

Then again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."

Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.

It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.

---

Thank you for understanding the reason for this thread and explaining it better than I can.