Thanks guys :)
And what discord? Id love to read up on the data ^.^
Printable View
Thanks guys :)
And what discord? Id love to read up on the data ^.^
Does anyone else think that notation looks cumbersome? Maybe something like C+U+U+Sy / C+U+U+Sy+ would be a viable way to indicate the upgraded parts, with the + after each one with the extra modified stats. (e.g original Syldra would be Sy and modified Syldra would be Sy+)
This is actually the exact thing we were debating and considering in said Submersible Discord. I think the consensus is to use the + annotation to confer when a part is modified. A fully modified CUUSy would be C+U+U+Y+.
Also yes, we're still debating between Sy and Y. I'll probably end up converting to Y as well.
In the context of the given content(in ENG at least) I'd say its clear, obvious and as simple as possible whilst still conveying the relevant information.
Nothing wrong with chatting in code in discord, if that floats your boat, but given that the number of people using said discord represent a tiny fraction of the playerbase, and probably an even smaller fraction of the views on this thread I think I'm on pretty solid ground as far as accessbility goes.
https://i.imgur.com/gpJc4sM.png
A fix, north isle of zozonan unlocks sea of ash 1 and 2, not southern charnel trench (which is covered in the next one)
Clear enough to read, but harder to type (especially on a phone)
Besides the spreadsheet issue (which is already enough of a problem), it can also be a bit harder to see the difference.
Succinct, clear, and easy to type. I like that one.