Lilies on the grave... (HW-spoiler ahead!)

On a semi-related topic I came across this one Goldsmith Levequest that when I first saw it I assumed House Fortemps were just being stiff-upper-lip about it all but now having seen them react to Haurchefant's death I'd say it seems oddly out-of-character for them to act that way;

Quote:

---

One of the newest inductees of hospitaliers has recently experienced the first loss under her care, a frail son of the lord of House Fortemps. The first death is always the most unbearable, yet the Fortemps family allows her no rest, blaming the poor woman for their son's early ascension. She has spent recent days withdrawn in repentant prayer to the Fury, and I wish to help her through the pain by giving her a pair of earrings to soothe her soul and eventually beckon her back to the healing table.

---

Not on My Table

Is it the wrong name and a typo? Is it chronologically out-of-order and did we haul Haurchefant to whatever passes for an A&E in Ishgard? Was there a fourth son and is Count Edmont just having an really bad year?

I've seen that levequest.

Lord Haurchefant is brawny (as far as I know). He's certainly not frail at all. IDK that's a weird one. There are multiple families under each House when you start including servants, knights, craftsmen etc. The phrase "THE" lord of House Fortemps makes this one confusing, though. Neither the Count nor any of his sons mention a fourth child, but maybe that's a plot point the MSQ hasn't gotten to yet who knows.

Hmmm. Maybe the youngest son is a Fourth Astral Era Allagan? I'm going to take a wild guess that they meant to say "the frail son of a House Fortemps bannerman," but it got lost in the consistency checks somewhere. These things happen.