Any mention of dodge ala GW2?
Printable View
Any mention of dodge ala GW2?
Sweet. For me this is mostly an issue with offensive AoEs, such that the caster doesn't accidentally hit enemies they didn't mean to hit with their spell.
What would be EVEN MORE awesome is if we could target an area of ground with AoEs instead of requiring them to be centered on a target. This of course would make the targeting radius even more importent.
Woot, I'm excited about this I was gonna mention the Raid boss hint system in another thread now I don't have to!
Guess work isn't skill or challenge, it's guessing. The display of information means nothing if the player doesn't know what to do with it or isn't skilled enough to act on it. Information is just that, nothing more. It's not dodging attacks for you, it's just telling you whether or not you're in range. Being spoonfed information doesn't make you a better player and by the same token it doesn't make you a worse player. Just like the aggro indicator it means absolutely nothing if you don't know how to use that information.
A visual display isn't better or worse than a range number skill wise. It's just different ways of displaying information for the same reason.
In fact for something like the Nael Darnus hard mode fight, a visual indicator of his AoEs would do you little good as they go off too fast for you to react. The range number add-on that some used was the only way to make sure you were always at the appropriate range, no matter what the attack was. Some would say it requires less skill as you don't even have to react to it.
This is casualizing the fights.
I think it should be better if the boss mechanics actually helped you to learn the range and all that, instead of giving an external indicator, but oh well...
Hi Kenshiro,
Initially it feels like it maybe "casualizing" the fight as you say, but as Arcell mentions above, remember the outcry over the Enmity / Aggro Indicator when they first talked about? People were decrying that it'd ruin the game.
Instead the Enmity Indicator has been really helpful and useful and allows players to gauge how to manage their attacks and how far they can "ride Red Enmity" without ever going over into Flashing Red Enmity, etc.
While I personally don't need to have this new AOE Range Indicator, I think it would be helpful, as sadly, Square's Battle Team have already implemented some Boss Attack Moves that just *don't* read very well at all. Some examples:
- Garuda - Mistral Shriek: Why do so many people want to skip Phase 2 of Garuda? Mistral Shriek and Song are 2 key reasons. There have been times that I could've sworn I was far enough away on the opposite end of the Arena when Garuda did Mistral Shriek, only to be hit still. The Visual FX, Animations, Environment all *failed* to indicate properly how far away to be. Of course you can just try to "hug the oppposite wall" to be totally sure.
So in 2.0, having an AOE Indicator might actually be helpful and useful. Players will still have to decide what to do with the information and react to it.
- Nael Deus Darnus (Rivenroad Hard) - Iron Chariot + Lunar Dynamo: I'm still baffled that the Battle Team actually put in these 2 AOE Attacks and expected players to be able to accurately "guess" the perfect distance to be far enough away from Iron Chariot, but not too far away to be hit by Lunar Dynamo (you have a, what?, 1.5 yalm "gap" to stand to not be hit by either). Of course people with a 3rd Party App can read the distance, but without it? It's all eyeballing. Again, here, the VFX and Animations fail to teach the Player how to counteract this.
Currently, an average player fighting Van Darnus Hard and figuring out Iron Chariot and Lunar Dynamo ranges without any help is an exercise in frustration.
Thanks.