6.08 Patch Notes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CKNovel

"Pick your flavor and enjoy it" I'm sorry but this is hugbear level of copium.
When playing your job, you should feel useful to the party. If the differences were minor, no problem.
But we talk about big discrepancy there.

I love MCH but I can't enjoy it because the job is nothing but a burden to the group
It doesn't brings healing, shielding, extra mitigation, it doesn't brings rDPS, it only brings DPS and it's garbage.

What's wrong with simply requesting to be useful to the group?

---

MCH *does* bring mitigation - it's called tactician. In light party content, MCH will also be greater damage than both BRD and DNC by virtue of having fewer players for the more support-centric physical ranged jobs to buff. In a competent group, MCH *should* fall off against less selfish jobs. If the rest of the group isn't great, MCH would be the better option.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Xuled

“Buff these jobs” - GCBTW
“Ok” - Yoshi-P
“NO NOT LIKE THAT!” - GCBTW

For the vast majority of you the numbers are fine. You won’t and aren’t raiding the high end while it’s relevant so just pick your flavor and enjoy it. The tears are unreal, I’ve seen less in League.

---

What is the point of you posting? You're saying it's fine for most people. But acknowledge on higher end there is an imbalance, which justifies their complaints. People aren't complaining about jobs that they wanted buff being buffed, their complaining about already exceeding classes being buffed. So you just want to put down people that aren't good at the game? While assuming who clears when and plays at what level? Let people advocate for good things instead of putting people down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Xaphire

MCH *does* bring mitigation - it's called tactician. In light party content, MCH will also be greater damage than both BRD and DNC by virtue of having fewer players for the more support-centric physical ranged jobs to buff. In a competent group, MCH *should* fall off against less selfish jobs. If the rest of the group isn't great, MCH would be the better option.

---

Melee have Feint and casters have Addle, Tactician shouldn't be considered novel or unique utility. It's the bare minimum.
MCH should deal more dmg than it does, or bring some more utility.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Asari5

they could nerf things. but oh no that would provoke a shit-storm because nobody thinks reaper is too strong.

---

Thank goodness you're not a dev.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tlamila

How does balancing some classes to be more on par with the rest make the content easier?

Cause PLD and DNC being gated out of savage cause of their trash damage was totally fun and exciting and challenging instead. And other such things.

---

Some jobs needed buffs, others didn't and reaper just needed a nerf. This means that content doesn't receive an indirect nerf which is what happens when you buff most DPS jobs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Teno

Thank goodness you're not a dev.

---

So you are happy content gets a nerf?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by raelgun

Some jobs needed buffs, others didn't and reaper just needed a nerf. This means that content doesn't receive an indirect nerf which is what happens when you buff most DPS jobs.

---

Pray tell me, outside of obvious Monk, which jobs that got buffed didn't need buffs?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tlamila

Pray tell me, outside of obvious Monk, which jobs that got buffed didn't need buffs?

---

Most DPS jobs, they only looked rough when compared to reaper, remove reaper from the list then most jobs fall into where they were.

It's reaper that skews the data for others.

Imagine demanding that RDPS or a support DPS do the same or even better damage than a melee dps ( MNK,SAM ,NIN) or BLM.

Stunning

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by raelgun

Most DPS jobs, they only looked rough when compared to reaper, remove reaper from the list then most jobs fall into where they were.

It's reaper that skews the data for others.

---

Are you sure that just isn't people that are just bad at those jobs?