"Do you disagree with that?" "well, yes" I'm done dude.
Printable View
"Do you disagree with that?" "well, yes" I'm done dude.
You didn't read it all. I'm not refuting the fact, but rebutting your opinion.
I don't know how much more can I clarify how you're mixing your opinions into facts. Then some how saying your opinion is the fact.
Here is another example;
FFXIV had plans to charge us for $12.99. That's a fact.
Using your reasoning but just changing the subject matter;
Would you agree on that opinion?Quote:
How can anyone say XIV shouldn't be charged $12.99, when XIV had already planned to charge us for $12.99.
Would you agree on the OPINION that since FFXIV had plans to be charged at $12.99 that it SHOULD remain at $12.99.
Because that is using the fact to justify the opinion, that is exactly what you are saying with this
just give up lack, it's pretty apparent that he had no interest in a debate since... well, the first post.
We are talking about exceptions, and rules here.
Exception: this game had a poor release due to some really bad game designs.
The company is desperately attempting to salvage the game. SE feels that failing this title would result in a critical blow to the franchise's name. My personal stance on payment has absolutely nothing to do with this topic.
I challenge you to please quote me, at least once, in the thread where I said I want and need other final fantasy races in this game.
You cannot. I merely stated that there has been precedence. You then mention branding, and how they do not include races as a method of branding a new final fantasy. I then proceeded to remind you that XIV races are not original, and they were ripped from XI.
The only opinion I have ever offered was "that is a weak excuse"; in regard to peoples' reasoning that this game could not see races from other games within the series because they are offline rpgs.