That is simply not true. You are wrong again. All of mage's spells have a range of at least 12 paces. And many of their spells have a range of 15 paces.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coglin
Maximum range for a close shot is 10 paces. And the best range for a close shot (you did want to do damage with it, did you not?) is 3 paces.
Shouldn't you stop spouting nonsense about archer already?
ARC Auto-attack = Ranged attack..
Printable View
-
11-29-2011, 06:43 PMYonnji
-
11-29-2011, 06:45 PMCoglin
wait.....so your claiming close shot is not a ranged attack ?
I made no claims of "best range" or "at least"....only claims I made are that they "are" ranged attacks, and steady damage, to claim I said anything else if to simply Lie.
Nt to mention, you have no abilitiy to claim to know anything about mage abilities with 0 level toward THM and only a 14 Con, you have no idea what your talking about
Troll on my friend troll on. -
11-29-2011, 07:28 PMYonnjiYet more wiggling. You're grasping for a straw now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coglin
If I have made a mistake in my comparison of ranges of mage's spells and archer's close shot, you can try to disprove me. So why don't you, if you're such a great mage and not just a pompous turkey?Quote:
Nt to mention, you have no abilitiy to claim to know anything about mage abilities with 0 level toward THM and only a 14 Con, you have no idea what your talking about
-
11-29-2011, 09:48 PMCoglin
Would you be so kind as to explain what you are saying?
I have said the same thing in 3 different post, each time you quote me you tell me I am incorrect in a different way from the last. I am not even sure you understand the topic of the original post I made in this chain of discussion. Perhaps it would benefit you to reread it, level a mage so you actually have a comparison to comprehend the post itself, and perhaps drop the direct name calling you started. -
12-01-2011, 02:23 AMArcell
Wait just one second....I thought people were complaining about getting the auto-attack. That's the general vibe I got from some of the threads in general. Now you're all complaining about not getting the auto-attack? Can't please anyone these days I guess.
Honestly I think they should just give Archer a ranged auto-attack and take ammunition out as a gameplay mechanic. Ammunition as it stands does nothing special, they all do the same thing. If different arrows had different effects, I'd say leave it. As it stands now it adds nothing to the gameplay. At least if they did the above you wouldn't have people complaining about spending money and "wasting" arrows on auto-attack. -
12-01-2011, 02:29 AMScherwizI agree, and I think that is probably the best answer at this point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcell
-
12-01-2011, 04:42 AMcarraway
-
12-01-2011, 08:37 AMCoglin
As I was saying before. I personally believe that Con/Thm/Arc should all have a ranged AA. Arc should be pierce resist, and as mentioned, cost no arrows, Con should be a magical dart or what not thats a combination of its elemental attacks, as well as Thm.
-
12-02-2011, 02:43 AMSpider-Dan
Carraway, that's day 1 ARC technology. Get with the times.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_cMjUQYOmI
P.S. How do you embed Youtube videos on this forum? -
12-08-2011, 02:51 AMLlanI don't think ARC AA should cost no arrows. But I do believe we should have a ranged AA. Its stupid that we punch enemies. WE PUNCH ENEMIES! WTH WERE THEY THINKING?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coglin