Keep in mind that the fight against Sephirot was nothing like how it was in ffvi. It wouldn't surprise me if neither of the two others share anything aside from appearance with their ffvi counterparts as well.
Printable View
My biggest question is what beast tribe worshiped Sophia?
We have no hints, not like the Sightseeing Log of Sephirot.
Completely random, unfounded stab in the dark for beyond even 3.4: Alisae returns to the party and spends a good deal of screentime building a rapport with her brother, and the big cliffhanger for 3.55 (assuming we get additional MSQ like we did last time) is the Alphinaud somehow becomes separated from us and imperiled, which sets up Alisae as our primary "sidekick" for 4.0 as we search for her brother in addition to al the inevitable liberating/primal slaying we end up doing.
Also Deftarm should join our party because reasons.
While it's relevant again, I'd like to go over the Lahabrea / Elidibus [Balance / Hydaelyn is bad] thing with a fine-toothed comb. It's overdue.
Let me start out by saying that I'm not attempting to dismiss the idea of questioning Hydaelyn; the righteous should welcome doubt, for it can only be overcome, and their position will be all the stronger for it. If Hydaelyn is The Way, She can take some questioning. But that cuts both ways, and the idea of buying what the Ascians are selling raises some concerns for me when subjected to that same level of skepticism.
There's no denying that we're meant to question to what degree the Light should be spreading. Right off the bat, that begs one question: With how badly Hydaelyn has been losing, are the Ascians even accurate in their characterization of Light overstepping its bounds? Or has the Light just stopped following the millennia-old trend of getting weaker and weaker? If Hydaelyn is pushed back 40 yards and regains 10, She's still not even back to midfield. But let's put that aside for now. Let's assume the Light is really threatening the marches, here.
Let's start with the big claim by Lahabrea:
Now there's an accusation! But Lahabrea holds it rather inconsistently, casting as much doubt on him as he's heaping on Hydaelyn.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lahabrea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lahabrea
Which company line to Lahabrea's minions follow?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lahabrea
And other Ascians on board with his plans?Quote:
Originally Posted by Masked Magus
They spend an uncomfortable amount of time acting like any other creature possessed of the Dark's greed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nabriales
So let's move on to Elidibus, starting with a line borrowed from French and his talk of cosmic balance:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloud of Darkness
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elidibus (FR)
A bit more consistent, this one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elidibus
Let's pause to consult our allies. Many have made comments about the Light's role in beckoning the Darkness.
The Ascians agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wandering Minstrel
Oddly, our allies usually follow that up with, "We should still purge / banish / cast out / etc. the Dark, tho." Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascian of the Twelfth Sword
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urianger
Why are even primals quick to champion harmony while denouncing Darkness?Quote:
Originally Posted by Urianger
Back to Elidibus, whose failure to address this niche of the topic I find ... concerning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramuh
For all his consistency, he's also consistently vague. We would "be of one mind" if we fully accepted the power of the Echo? Why is he not more specific? What if I assumed he meant that literally, a la Ascian Prime, all of our souls crammed into one? What if I assumed he meant that we should all just transcended mortality, Crystal be damned, leave the cycle of the Lifestream, and accept that the death of the world we fought for was fait accompli and for the best? What if he's just assuming that we definitely wouldn't be on board if he was any clearer?
Notice that zero champions of the Anti-Light crowd have any stake in the status of mortals post-endgame.
Notice that Hydaelyn was pretty specific about what She expected in such a scenario.
Elidibus says that he's not our enemy, that we'd share his goals, and that he just wants to make things right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydaelyn
So, when he had the chance, why didn't he even try to refute that accusation?
Didn't the Gerun Oracles imply that the "original state" of mortals was "nonexistent"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Elidibus
Given the same opportunity to make a return to the good old days sound like a swell idea, Lahabrea somehow managed to do worse.
I'm left feeling equally concerned that 1) Hydaelyn's version of the story is, at best, biased, or at worst, incomplete and misleading. And that 2) agreeing with the Ascians is equivalent to saying, "They have a point. Let's just die." (Okay, maybe I'm a little more concerned about the second one, personally, but objectively they're roughly on par.)Quote:
Originally Posted by Lahabrea
"If only we had some other ancient third party's opinion."
- Something I think I saw someone say somewhere probably.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat
There are definitely some questions as to the story Hydaelyn would have us believe. But are we also at risk of becoming...Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgardsormr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hraesvelgr
This seems like a great time to quote the Thaumaturges' Guildmaster...
But this is the same lalafell that called bats and slugs voidsent. Sooo... not the most authoritative source.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocobuki
#TEAMHYDAELYN