Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Player Wonder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1
    Character
    Wonderangel
    World
    Asura
    Main Class
    BLU Lv 99

    [June 6, 2011 Version Update] "Reinfuse previous atma set" option

    When performing atma infusions, players may now view and select from a list of their twelve most recently infused atma.
    *Players will be able to infuse two or three atma at once using this list.
    *This feature will function independently of the "Reinfuse previous atma set" option. Atma selected from the list will not overwrite the previous atma set, nor will atma infused via "Reinfuse..." be stored in the list.
    I noticed that after I choose multiple atma from the recently infused atma list, if I enter another time and select "Reinfuse previous atma set" option, i found only an atma (the first that was select from recently infused atma) :\.
    Is there any chance to have all 3 atma infused last time with "Reinfuse previous atma set" option?
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player Zyeriis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    San D'Oria - Phoenix
    Posts
    935
    Character
    Zyeriis
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    COR Lv 90
    I was about to post about this. The "Reinfuse previous atma set" option and the newer option do not work together. The "reinfuse previous atma" option only works for the last atma set you created using the original menus for atma selection. Is this going to be fixed in the next update?
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player Raksha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,205
    Character
    Raksha
    World
    Lakshmi
    Main Class
    SCH Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Zyeriis View Post
    I was about to post about this. The "Reinfuse previous atma set" option and the newer option do not work together. The "reinfuse previous atma" option only works for the last atma set you created using the original menus for atma selection. Is this going to be fixed in the next update?
    As I recall they did this on purpose because of feedback in the thread where this suggestion was brought up.

    I dont remember the exact reasoning behind it but I do remember that it sounded reasonable enough to me at the time.

    If you really want to know it shouldnt be too hard to find the old thread (could even use the dev tracker).
    (0)