
Originally Posted by
Greatguardian
Effective compared to what?
Good compared to what?
Good because they do 2,500 damage?
Effective because enough of them will kill something in some arbitrary period of time?
White Mage nukes don't suck because they do 500 damage. They suck because they do 500 damage while Black Mage's do 5,000 damage.
White Mage nukes don't suck because they're unable to kill things with them. They suck because they take longer to kill with them than a Black Mage nuking would.
You keep saying "It's good", and "It's effective", but by whose standard? How good is it? How much is good enough? What do you consider good, and not good?
Frankly, I don't consider 3k Vorpals good at all when I can consistently do 5k Smites, both more often, and with significantly more TP phase damage in between.
Frankly, I don't consider 600MP, 20% Max Cure Potency, and Cure 1-4 good at all when I can do significantly better on any mage job.
Herp Bloody Freakin' Derp: Easy Content is So Easy that Anyone with Any Job can do it, QED: All jobs are awesome and Paladin is a boss tier Healer.
@Aeonk, That doesn't change the fact that the person would always be more useful and better on Warrior than they would on Paladin. A good player is a good player. A bad player is a bad player. A good job is a good job and a bad job is a bad job, for the situation at hand. In Abyssea? Paladin is utter crap and any good player running around on it is essentially an utter waste of potential.