Zyeriis (or anyone else in favour of this idea) are you able to give sound reasons, backed up with some mathematics, as to why a Throwing buff and weapon skills would be beneficial and doable?
Zyeriis (or anyone else in favour of this idea) are you able to give sound reasons, backed up with some mathematics, as to why a Throwing buff and weapon skills would be beneficial and doable?
In favour of which idea? Making throwing viable and not utterly useless? All that math showed was how it was useless. You expect me to create mathematic formulas to replace the bad formulas that are already in place to make my argument? As I haven't seen the math that says that a different mathematical formula that does not currently exist (thus the problem) that can make throwing at least semi-useful (whether this is damage or otherwise to which we are referring) then, no.
Until you can back up the "anti-throwing because I think throwing is stupid" "argument" with an actual reason aside from "it's too late" (non-mathematical) or "if they haven't done it yet so they won't" (non-mathematical unless you count that as probability, in which case, you can't deny that it is in fact possible, because there is no probability without possibility) or "i don't want this, I want something else because my views on what is useful are steeply based in the current mechanics and thus are the only way things can be" (non-mathematical), then, again, no, you will not receive mathematical formulas that do not currently exist within the game to counter that. Why? This has nothing to do with the very mathematical equations that were brought up, aside from them being the problem. Closed mindedness, so far steeped in the present that it can not see the alternative, is getting annoying but, please, continue.
Taken from my original post on page 2 of this thread: THE MATH
So the person who said I don't read the thread in fact didn't read my original post? funny!
Almost as funny as you claiming gil is useless, and acting like you have everything, while sporting that pink body and shoes with your 1 piece of af3+2 and 1 piece of af3+1 with that swift belt, among other wonderful items. Where's all those relics and mythics you implied you had, and all that wonderful gear?
http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Phoenix/Zyeriis#home
If you had a bit of gil you could probably upgrade to more useful stuff, like dusk gloves+1, speed belt, brutal earring, boxers mantle, etc. And if you had a clue about NIN you would use af1 body over pink body, and go solo durinn for some 4 haste shoes instead of that pink mess. They're not the best, but its an easy easy solo and 100x better then what you got.
http://www.twitch.tv/wish12oz
http://www.youtube.com/user/r5n/videos
Have a pissing contest with some one else (considering ive only been back little more than a month or so and nin isn't my only job), also the gear on ffxiah isn't up to date to say the least. Did I mention how that post has nothing to do with anything other than your argument being so far stuck in the current scheme of things that it isn't an actual argument because it's based in the notion that formulas cannot be changed. Which I've already proven they've changed before. See: Abyssea Exp Mechanics. Why would i "upgrade" to dusk gloves +1 when with my actual gear I have capped haste? Oh so I can run slower, alright. Also, there's this thing called evasion, which nin af body doesn't have. FFXIAH sure is accurate in showing every piece of equipment I use, isn't it? If you knew anything about the game, you'd know different situations call for different gear and different subs (lol /war only nin).
P.S. I proved you don't read things earlier, did you forget?
Last edited by Zyeriis; 06-03-2011 at 12:56 PM.
|
|
© SQUARE ENIX FINAL FANTASY, SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks of Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. Vana'diel , Tetra Master, PLAYONLINE, the PLAYONLINE logo, Rise of the Zilart, Chains of Promathia, Treasures of Aht Urhgan, and Wings of the Goddess are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. The rating icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Online play requires internet connection. |