More ???'s for emp NMs

[scaevola]

Just read the update notes for next week about adding more ??? to pop emp nms.

People will without a doubt use this as not intended and pop two NMs at once and aoe brew them both down at once, hoping you make this so that the same alliance can't have claim on both at once and maybe put the ??? far enough apart to make popping one after the other a non-issue.

The whole point of adding more pop locations is to stop a monopoly which people will still do with both if you let them.

Oh no, that guy camping Sobek for his Kannagi will be done twice as fast! This hurts everybody!

[Seriha]

Well, this assumes all the pops will be by each other, as well. Either way, I'd hope for at least 3-5 instances of a mob, and for all we know they could tweak these particular pops to set a Confrontation status that prevents popping a second or more until the fight's done, while at the same time people can't join and actively fighting party.

[Sama]

Oh no, that guy camping Sobek for his Kannagi will be done twice as fast! This hurts everybody!

You will still have a big problem with KI NM.

[Darka]

You will still have a big problem with KI NM.

A bunch of KIs were added to gold chests, Guku included.

I don't see the issue, even if they monopolize both ???s, better than them monopolizing just one right? They'll be done twice as fast, and makes it less likely they'll obtain another KI between pops. Happy with this, means I don't have to wait on gimps to whittle Dragua and Bukhis down as long.

[svengalis]

The empyrean bosses should be instanced in something like a bcnm this would solve all our problems.

[Sama]

A bunch of KIs were added to gold chests, Guku included.

I don't think those guys will rely on chests... But agree with the kill, they will done twice faster and get out of other people's way.

[Tsukino_Kaji]

People will without a doubt use this as not intended and pop two NMs at once and aoe brew them both down at once, hoping you make this so that the same alliance can't have claim on both at once and maybe put the ??? far enough apart to make popping one after the other a non-issue.

This ^. Who cares if one group has both NMs if they're brewing them? They'll be dead in 10-30 seconds.

Infact, multi-brew was the first thing I thought of doing.

[Runespider]

Emps are currently the endgame material, the quicker you let the hardcore players finish them....the quicker they will start the next. It's not really a case of they will be done and gone, they will do more peoples at once.

[Tsukino_Kaji]

Emps are currently the endgame material, the quicker you let the hardcore players finish them....the quicker they will start the next. It's not really a case of they will be done and gone, they will do more peoples at once.

Exactly. The faster people get it done, the more the rest of us can get to it.

[Sama]

Emps are currently the endgame material, the quicker you let the hardcore players finish them....the quicker they will start the next. It's not really a case of they will be done and gone, they will do more peoples at once.

Things are soooo easy with Abyssea now what can you do about it? You just hope those guys might be afk or not looking at the window at the time you try to pop Sobek. Or else you are asking SE to limit the relic/mystic/emp weapon per account.