A few thoughts I have on this:
1 ) The new monsters should either not aggro (their danger would only be to those who want to fight them and from careless Area of Effect attacks)
OR
2 ) They should have at least positioned the aggro monsters away from quest areas and paths of necessary travel that they KNOW people will be traveling.
3 ) If they're feeling exceptionally motivated to get people into the new Grounds of Valor and at the same time keep the areas safe for their previous functions, they should have made all the new monsters like a massive voidwalker invasion. I'm fairly sure the decision to require hunting the NMs via resting/popping was to allow the placement of the original Voidwalker NMs (extremely powerful NMs) in low level zones without interfering with their intended purposes. Continue this line of reasoning!
* People should be unable to interact with the invading monsters unless their spectral alignment is right (on a Grounds of Valor page quest), thus making them invisible except to those under the new status for those new Voidstone battles. Just to point out the relationship between Voidwalker NMs and this system: I'm not saying to make spawning the normal monsters require hunting down and resting and then hunting... just invisible to players they don't interact with.
* This could potentially allow use of the new mini-atma effects as additional buffs.
* In this way, they could tie the new monsters in with the NM battle system by allowing people to build their spectral alignments on fodder monsters through staggers (like in the new Dynamis areas - I know the treasure caskets in these areas drop the new voidwalker cells, but those have a cap), which would make it possible for the actual NM battles to be more challenging: Rather than "try to keep the NM alive long enough to get enough staggers for drops"... the staggers become a method of weakening the NMs that would otherwise be overwhelmingly powerful. NM battles could be faster and more dangerous.
I guess it may be too late to implement this concept... but it's worth noting.

Reply With Quote



