Concerns about SCH.

[Aaralyn]

Like I said, you dont need 2 cure 5s

Just have cure5 check wether your mainjob is whm, if so give low enmity, else give high enmity.

It's actually pretty easy to do. If-then statements are some of the first things you learn when studying a programming language.

<if spell="Cure V">
<amount_cured=" MND + Healing skill * cure potency" />
<if $main_job = "WHM">
<Enmity_Gained="400 CE", "700 VE" />
</if>
<else>
<Enmity_Gained="$Cure_enmity_formula" />
</else>
</if>

Crude, I know, but it really isnt that difficult. You could probably learn to do something similar in 1 hour if you tried.

Said I was assuming. Can you name a spell that has the example you've written out?

[Raksha]

Said I was assuming. But I'm retarded, so can you name a spell that has the example you've written out?

Utsusemi: Ni.

[Aaralyn]

Utsusemi: Ni.

Thank you.

Merton, doing that in the LS I'm in wouldn't cut it. If I see an NM readying a TP move that would hurt a lot, then I would cast Cure V or VI so the SS would soften the blow, then cure up however much damage they received. Because of that, there have been times where I've had to use Cure IV because I used Cure V or VI for the SS, after having used one or the other for when shadows are down (our MNK tanks come sub /WAR, is that normal?). Apademak for example.

We also have 2 to 3 DDs at least on everything after procs, instead of just one. Both my friend and I keep auspice up. We both full time Orison Bliaud +2 except for curaga's. It's just the way this LS is. Spamming Cure V and VI would indeed be boring. Her and I don't mind having to tank occasionally. We have -PDT sets and -MDT sets. We've never died during the times we've had to tank. So no harm.

Sometimes, we even have to cast Curaga III and IV!