The less relevant content takes a back seat to the overall progress on the wiki. BG has vastly more editors and more quality work being done at all times for close to a decade now.

The gardening or whatever is for when I or anyone up to the task gets around to it. However, it is not hard to make any edge case like this superior to what exists now. In general the information and layout on Clopedia is inferior or superfluous. Even fringe sections that get looked at for answers to something and cited as why it matters, are inaccurate or flat-out wrong.

I would love to work with players on this, and often end up looking over or touching up the work that does get done every day. Which of course also takes time. However, I can say the integrity of the information is overall superior on BG compared to Clopedia.