Please Rework "FULL BREAK'S" effectiveness + other GA ws's like it DEV TEAM /wave

[Tamarsamar]

The art was created for the concept, so they go together and I see no reason to change it based on such types of misunderstandings and assumptions.

[sarcasm]I never would've guessed.[/sarcasm]

Seriously, though, if you can't see that the thing reeks of narcissism, then, well, perhaps you're narcissist . . .

Wow... you successfully dodged that bit of "clear example" and have replaced it with something else entirely... uhh.. hmm.. Lets try one last time.
The watermelon in my example would represent "Full Break". If you managed to rework how it functioned (the way the effects were calculated), it would possibly alter the other weapon based enfeebles in FFXI by in turn sharing those new calculations. I don't think I can put it any more plane than that... so hopefully that clears it up for you.

Again, it was already blatantly obvious what you meant by this, but since I am so naive as to believe that you can be taught that you're wrong, I'm going to try and say this one last time:

Adjustments to Full Break do NOTHING for any other Weapon Skill at all.

Why you seem to consistently fail to understand that is what baffles me. Can hubris really extend so far as to mire even basic concepts?

Yeah... thanks for clearing that up >< /stagger. Reason works just fine with me, it's the opposite of it that I'm not to keen on. Yes, I'm quite aware that SE has a very capable legal department that understands the laws associated with "suggestions" offered up by players should they chose to implement them, so you have nothing to worry about in regards to me demanding a check. That, and I'm not an idiot... no offense to idiots though.

If reason "worked fine with you," you would've seen that adjusting Full Break doesn't affect any other Weapon Skill three pages ago! Furthermore, should reason have "worked fine with you," you would've seen how utterly silly you look by making your current signature. Hopefully, you can see why I would be given reason to doubt this statement.



Pride, man. It's one heck of a drug.

[kingfury]

[sarcasm]I never would've guessed.[/sarcasm]

Seriously, though, if you can't see that the thing reeks of narcissism, then, well, perhaps you're narcissist . . .

-----------
That or you have serious envy issues you should address before commenting further. I'm done with this topic, thanks.
-----------

Again, it was already blatantly obvious what you meant by this, but since I am so naive as to believe that you can be taught that you're wrong, I'm going to try and say this one last time:
Adjustments to Full Break do NOTHING for any other Weapon Skill at all.

----------
Right, because you've attempted to be open-minded and offer creativity on this topic at which point? My replies to what you've said is all due to your lack of willingness to understand a thing I've said /stagger. "YOU", thankfully, are in no position to say whether or not adjustments to Full Break is a worthy suggestion, so while your opinion is excepted here, your closed-minded responses do little to add to the discussion. I'll await feedback from a worthy source, thanks.
----------

If reason "worked fine with you," you would've seen that adjusting Full Break doesn't affect any other Weapon Skill three pages ago! Furthermore, should reason have "worked fine with you," you would've seen how utterly silly you look by making your current signature. Hopefully, you can see why I would be given reason to doubt this statement.

----------
Annnd rinse and repeat the last two responses. Thanks again for your time. /

[kingfury]

I'm incredibly confused by what I'm hearing lol ><;

Accusing me of promoting crappy threads in part by my suggestions is shear poop in a hand basket, but I think a "Thank You" is in order so Thank You for considering my concept "decent". / I think... lol

[Mrbeansman]

I'm incredibly confused by what I'm hearing lol ><;

Accusing me of promoting crappy threads in part by my suggestions is shear poop in a hand basket, but I think a "Thank You" is in order so Thank You for considering my concept "decent". / I think... lol

By receiving a gold star by the community team you became an inspiration to idiots intentional or not. You cant honestly tell me that you think you are free of blame for some of the shit.

[Qeepel]

Hi guys, please keep the comments on topic. Thank you.

[kingfury]

Hi guys, please keep the comments on topic. Thank you.

-------------
I will do my very best Qeepel /salute ^^;

Even though ramblings do happen, I try my best to reply to each post out of respect(even when they are at times devoid of respect), but if it looks like it's continuing to steer too far off topic, I'll just let it fall on a deaf ear.

[kingfury]

lol Tell you what Mrbean, out of concern that such foolishness will possibly get my thread locked, if it will in fact help you drop the topic then "yes", by offering up a (as you put it) "decent" suggestion on these general discussion boards I have in fact inspired others to try their hand at proposing their own ideas to the Dev Team. Whether they are quality ideas or not. END
Thanks for your feedback... wait... actually I don't think you had any feedback based on the thread topic... but no matter. /take care

[Mrbeansman]

lol Tell you what Mrbean, out of concern that such foolishness will possibly get my thread locked, if it will in fact help you drop the topic then "yes", by offering up a (as you put it) "decent" suggestion on these general discussion boards I have in fact inspired others to try their hand at proposing their own ideas to the Dev Team. Whether they are quality ideas or not. END
Thanks for your feedback... wait... actually I don't think you had any feedback based on the thread topic... but no matter. /take care

Not sure doesn't sound very sincere.

And whats there to say that hasn't been said already? It's a dumb idea unlike your last decent one.

[Rezeak]

I think that asking a WAR to sacrifice it's hardest hitting abilty (aka Weapon skill) to enfeeble a mob isn't the way to go.

If you want them to be used just make them Job abiltys but rememeber they shouldn't take the limelight from Angon or Feint

[kingfury]

I think that asking a WAR to sacrifice it's hardest hitting abilty (aka Weapon skill) to enfeeble a mob isn't the way to go.
If you want them to be used just make them Job abiltys but rememeber they shouldn't take the limelight from Angon or Feint

-----------------
Not as they are now, no, so I'd agree with you on that currently. If in fact GA's Breaks were strong enough effect wise, however, it would become a new battle tactic that would indeed warrant using before even the user themselves pop a ws, let alone other DD's in the party.

I say improve both Angon and Feint as well as Tomahawk moving forward to higher levels since they will be shoved into the corner of peoples mog house (if not already) after each passing update unless their effectiveness is addressed.