Dual Wield yes,please

[Xilk]

i doubt point 2 :x

and to point 1, you said u wouldn't want it. but u saying it again and again and again when anyone says that they would like it.......
one time would be enough.....

If you doubt point 2, then its because you are too lazy to look anything up. It also implies discussing w/ you is pointless, as fact and data are not important to any conclusions. Elvaan have top spot for mind. Galka and Hume are tied for 2nd. Mithra and taru are lower.

when someone wants a trait like dual wield on a job like bst... it just screams that they really want to play another job instead. It has NOTHING to do w/ being a beastmaster. It would be like randomly giving smn or whm the beast killer trait. Or, lets give samurai cure 2 natively at level 67.

If you are so married to a dual wield support job, then having it natively to bst would not make a difference in how you play anyway.

Thf, Dnc, and blu all used /nin almost exclusively. It was the ONLY way for thf and dnc most the time to have any dd output. It made some sense giving it to dnc or thf. The way blu job traits work, its feasible for blu to get it as well.

It makes absolutely no sense to give it to bst.

[Areola]

What makes it have nothing to do with beatsmaster? Does it not fit what you think bst play style should be? Does it not look normal to see a bst with two axes? Would it be to powerful? Does your family own a shield manufacturing company and duel-weal is cutting into your inheritance? Its just bst, what could possibly happen that's so unnerving?

I guess i just don't understand why people so deeply opposed to this idea, even though it will never happen.

[Xilk]

What makes it have nothing to do with beatsmaster? Does it not fit what you think bst play style should be? Does it not look normal to see a bst with two axes? Would it be to powerful? Does your family own a shield manufacturing company and duel-weal is cutting into your inheritance? Its just bst, what could possibly happen that's so unnerving?

I guess i just don't understand why people so deeply opposed to this idea, even though it will never happen.

proving a negative is a logical fallacy. If you feel that strongly about it, please suggest what about beastmaster implies, suggests or in any way relates to dual wield.

thf, dnc, and blu have their reasons (thf less than any others). Nin, it is blatantly obvious. Any other job has no connection at all. Unless you think dual wield should be available natively for ALL jobs. I feel it should not happen because it feels forced and contrived, and there are already ample ways to get dual wield on a bst if you like. The whole concept of support jobs is to add variety and contrasts.

[Alukat]

proving a negative is a logical fallacy. If you feel that strongly about it, please suggest what about beastmaster implies, suggests or in any way relates to dual wield.

thf, dnc, and blu have their reasons (thf less than any others). Nin, it is blatantly obvious. Any other job has no connection at all. Unless you think dual wield should be available natively for ALL jobs. I feel it should not happen because it feels forced and contrived, and there are already ample ways to get dual wield on a bst if you like. The whole concept of support jobs is to add variety and contrasts.

now explain me why dnc and blu have their reasons?
dnc single handed weapon
blu single handed weapon
nin single handed weapon
thf single handed weapon
pld (supposed to be tank , sword + shield obviously)
whm main healer
blm main nuker
rdm support
and bst (single handed too and front line job)?
Edit: snarl makes shield unneccessary in most situations anyway.

or wait pld undead tank because of undead killer, bst tank for animal mobs, samurai tank for demons?
bst is still 110 skill levels behind pld.......

we don't talk about DW 3-5 here just a simple DW I, u won't need to use it if u don't want.
but what in general hurts u with getting a simple DW I?