[Dev1001] Just more inventory space!

[Gamiina]

i feel that three inventory bags of 80 is enough for "in the field" access, However i would appreciate another "Mog House only" type of storage.

i think 240 spaces is more than enough to be able to access anywhere, lets not be greedy. Simply having another 80 in the mog house would allow you to empty out some of the "in the field" inventory bags and that would be enough to help everyone out im sure.

[Showmo]

i feel that three inventory bags of 80 is enough for "in the field" access, However i would appreciate another "Mog House only" type of storage.

i think 240 spaces is more than enough to be able to access anywhere, lets not be greedy. Simply having another 80 in the mog house would allow you to empty out some of the "in the field" inventory bags and that would be enough to help everyone out im sure.

Yeah, I agree. Inventory, Satchel, and Mog Sack is more than enough for outside storage. Although I wouldn't decline more outside storage, I wouldn't mind having more mog house storage space as well.

[rog]

Actually with all the new storage, i've never even come close to running out of mog house storage. However i like to carry around gear for 2 jobs, so i can switch jobs, and instantly leave the mh, and get gear while traveling where i'm going. This works very well for me, since i would mainly play two jobs, and often switch between them frequently, however the 180 slots, while it was enough for everything i needed, and then some, it didn't leave a ton of space for drops.

[Mog]

I just want more "Inventory" space too. RDM gear can easily max out Inventory space before you even attempt to put some melee gear in Inventory too, and there's no space left for meds, linkpearl, stuff that drops, etc.

You fail to understand the PS2 limitations comment.

They can only have grouped memory of 80 items. They can't program around this without having to radically redo even the most basic aspects of the game. Comparing it to WoW proves you don't really understand the situation. They are not comparable at all. SE has stated this several times already.

I've never read this either. It would be nice to see a link to one of these statements.

If 80 really is the highest size Inventory space can ever reach, would it not be possible to place gear swap gear in a seperate bag to the linkpearl, meds and treasure?
Maybe a "Mog Suitcase" with 80 slots, which all gear swapping takes place from instead of from Inventory, and you just place all the gear (probably ammo too) that you have in your macros, or plan to equip manually, in this bag instead?

[rog]

I just want more "Inventory" space too. RDM gear can easily max out Inventory space before you even attempt to put some melee gear in Inventory too, and there's no space left for meds, linkpearl, stuff that drops, etc.

I've never read this either. It would be nice to see a link to one of these statements.

If 80 really is the highest size Inventory space can ever reach, would it not be possible to place gear swap gear in a seperate bag to the linkpearl, meds and treasure?
Maybe a "Mog Suitcase" with 80 slots, which all gear swapping takes place from instead of from Inventory, and you just place all the gear (probably ammo too) that you have in your macros, or plan to equip manually, in this bag instead?

That could be done. The actual limit is 160, which is cut in half to 80, so it can display both inventory, and safe/locker/etc at once. This is why temp items work. The only coveat would be that it'd be impossible to transfer the equipment directly to safe/satchel/etc, and would need to be first transferred to your main inventory.

[Teakwood]

"I haven't done enough research into the problem" is not an acceptable excuse for ignorance. That said, it wouldn't hurt to have an official statement from SE about this now that we've got forums we can link to and discuss these things on.

There's no real way of getting out of the two bag at a time limitation, but I would be very interested in yet another mog sack. And by 'interested in' I mean 'you could probably get your playerbase to debase themselves utterly for this'.

Edit: Maxing storage at 99 is impossible; 80 is the actual hard cap on per-bag storage.

Pagronith: That would be a good idea! I don't think it's actually feasible, though. They're running up against severe memory allocation problems, and I'm not sure they'd actually be able to add in a system like they use for Guild Marks in FFXIV, unfortunately. This would be amazing, though; imagine seeing all your cruor, ichor, assault points, and so on, in one menu.

[rog]

Pagronith: That would be a good idea! I don't think it's actually feasible, though. They're running up against severe memory allocation problems, and I'm not sure they'd actually be able to add in a system like they use for Guild Marks in FFXIV, unfortunately. This would be amazing, though; imagine seeing all your cruor, ichor, assault points, and so on, in one menu.

It actually should be feasible. Linskhells definitely don't need to be an item. Seals can certainly be saved in such a way...seeing as beastmen/kindred seals already are with with whatshisface in port jeuno.

As far as gear, they can actually set an exrta inventory just for gear. It's limited to 160 in memory at a time, whether that's 80 inventory, and 80 satchel, or just 160 in inventory doesn't really matter. This is easily seen with temp items. If you have temp items, and open your safe, the temp items are unloaded to make room in ram for the items in your safe, which is why you can't see them at same time. If you were willing to put up with such a limitation with equipment, they could in fact extend our inventory up to 160. However, temp items would still interfere with that. You can have a max of 50 temp items, leaving 30 slots left which could be used to effectively extend our inventory.

I certainly wouldn't get your hopes up, but it absolutely would be possible to extend our inventory by 30, while working within current ps2 limitations, and code.

[ffxkenshin]

More bags is find with me, inventory accessible anywhere would be nice, we do have our almighty Moogle working for us don't we @.@

PS2 limitation is 80 per bag, (non-techincally speaking). So just give us MORE 80 limit bags then =D

With all the rare/ex gear/item/seal/etc/etc why do big change like delivery of rare/ex to mule, storage slips, blah blah blah, just give more inventory bag, less trouble for SE to code I think, and less trouble for us player trying to remember where we put the stuff. (gear set NPC, porter moogle, event item npc, etc etc)

[Karumac]

Give us the ability to choose which two bags are open as well. Sometimes I wanna move things from my Sack Satchel to my Locker or from Storage to Safe.

[thefinalrune]

I for one would welcome a new storage option within the mog house exclusively limited to furnishings. Storage is great and all, but its a real burden that I can't freely decorate my mog house without sacrificing a vast amount of my mog safe storage in the process. With all the furnishings we have access to its awful that we have to sacrifice visual appeal for storage space. Sure, mog houses are for the most part shortly visited and rarely have visitors, but its nice to have a place to store the various trophies and odds and ends I've accumulated over the years.