Don't you think that's a slightly exaggerated claim, Karbuncle, people aren't asking for Dual Wield VII and Beserk II, or no blood pact timers. Despite the specificity in some of those posts they can distilled down to "these jobs are underutilized and need changing in some way."
The real problem I have with the posts isn't just that they're saying there's no plans, but they're incredibly dismissive. They give no outline as to why they have no plans. When they do, it's often confusing or patently false. For example.
This kind of response makes me question the team they have got to communicate our feedback to the dev team. How often are they misrepresenting our arguments to the dev team due to lack of understanding. It also makes me question, if those responses have been given by the dev team, their level of understanding about the game."We have no intention of modifying automaton defense because they have already high defense compared to other pets. (False, Crabs have higher Defense than Valoredge and Wyverns have a base higher defense than all of the other frames). And you can buff their defense further with Protect and Shell (Incorrect, they cannot cast on themselves, nor can they be cast upon.)"
With this style of response, there's probably some element of 'lost in translation.' It's probably not the community teams fault if they get 1-2 sentence responses, and going back and asking for clarification can be tiresome when they need to be translated back and fourth.
The second kind of response they give is too vague.
These kind of responses tend to just confuse the community, and in cases like this there needs to be a little more transparency into the deeper thoughts about why what is said would happen. One good example of this is by the Localization leader, who has in the past given some insight into how the translation process works, and in one example gave us a reason as to why the equipment description box was expanded upon. That level of transparency is refreshing."We have no plans to do this, because that" or "The dev team say it's as fast as it can possibly be"
The third kind of response is the most irksome, "We have no plans to do this at the minute." Which really brings into question whether they were even brought up. There is no reason or rationale being mentioned.
These forums, I feel, are necessary. Feedback needs to be given. Square enix are not infallible, and it's questionable whether or not the developers actually play the game in any real capacity. The feedback from these forums often relays information to them about how the game is being played, and many people on here have got a fairly good understanding of how things mechanically work.
Not all feedback is equal, but not all feedback should be treated equally either. Having a community team that play the game would be helpful, because they could then be able to distinguish which posts are terrible and which are accurate. It's really disappointing to see the newest community rep last played at 75.

Reply With Quote


