You know what would be nice...

[Orenwald]

A cure V variant for PLD SCH and RDM. same MP cost, same Damage formula, but uses the normal Enmity formula instead of the static enmity value Cure V uses.

[Kavik]

Sounds like i'd just die more on sch then i already do, i can't imagine myself getting a cure 5 enmity amount as opposed to cure 4 which already does 502 cure 5 doing 900 and making as much enmity + some... nothing would be able to get hate off me, on pld that would make them much to uber at keeping hate, they don't love pld that much as a tank. For rdm i think the same thing would apply has i mentioned for sch.

[Tsukino_Kaji]

A cure V variant for PLD SCH and RDM. same MP cost, same Damage formula, but uses the normal Enmity formula instead of the static enmity value Cure V uses.

I dissagree. RDM, PLD, and especialy SCH do not need cure V as they are not WHMs.

[Kyrial]

I have to agree with Tsukino_Kaji. WHMs had to put up with a long period where RDMs were preferred as healers over WHMs (and SCHs would have been preferred over WHMs as well if they'd had Haste at the time), when WHM should *always* be the preferred healer. Right now, RDMs and SCHs are considered as healer only if a WHM is not available, which is the way it should be.

Now, PLD getting Cure V, but with a normal enmity formula instead of the one it uses right now for WHM... I'm not sure how I feel about that. I don't agree with Kavik that it would be too much hate for PLD, since enmity has a cap, and PLD reaches it just as easily as other DDs already. But I don't really wanna see PLDs getting invited as main heals for anything, lol.

[Atomic_Skull]

PLD should have a job trait that raises their maximum enmity cap by 10% by lvl 90.

[Orenwald]

Well the trade off is if your RDMs and SCHs spam Cure V then they'll generate a boatload of hate (mostly VE but still. . .)
They will die. The death. It would be horrible.

WHMs have Cure VI, and their Cure V is practically enmity free, so I think it'd be fine