Results 1 to 10 of 64

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    317
    I'm actually going to go out on a limb and say I don't think Dragons should be part of Beastmasters aresenal, but I do think other things, like Monoceros, Puks etc should be.

    I have more of an issue with their excuses as to why not, when they're releasing Beast and Automaton trusts. It strikes me as hypocritical.

    I also fully advocate the removal of a cap of beastmaster pets. Beast Affinity should give an amount of attack,acc and defense % and pets should be on equal footing.

    But they don't know what to do with crafts. When they release 120 crafting level what do you think cooking will be skilling up on? Probably in part jugpets. It means they can release stuff for beastmaster that doesn't require thought and pawn it off as if they're actually working on things. Why fix something that makes it look like you're working.

    I wouldn't be annoyed if Beastmasters got a dragon though. I just don't think it's strictly necessary. There's a lot left to tap into, my problem is they keep tapping into sheeps and crabs.
    (3)

  2. #2
    Player
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by Balloon View Post
    I'm actually going to go out on a limb and say I don't think Dragons should be part of Beastmasters aresenal, but I do think other things, like Monoceros, Puks etc should be.

    I have more of an issue with their excuses as to why not, when they're releasing Beast and Automaton trusts. It strikes me as hypocritical.

    I also fully advocate the removal of a cap of beastmaster pets. Beast Affinity should give an amount of attack,acc and defense % and pets should be on equal footing.

    But they don't know what to do with crafts. When they release 120 crafting level what do you think cooking will be skilling up on? Probably in part jugpets. It means they can release stuff for beastmaster that doesn't require thought and pawn it off as if they're actually working on things. Why fix something that makes it look like you're working.

    I wouldn't be annoyed if Beastmasters got a dragon though. I just don't think it's strictly necessary. There's a lot left to tap into, my problem is they keep tapping into sheeps and crabs.
    I can dig this^^

    However, as I alluded to, SE were discussing the four sky guardians and behemoths as possible pets; one of the guardians of sky is a wyvern, but yet, they back-peddled.

    Personally, i would like a behemoth, however, for them to allude to a implementable wyvern (Seiryu -esque) then backpeddle bugs me. I am willing to drop the subject (In this thread), but some ppl are acting like this is forbidden grounds when SE alluded to it themselves "SMH"

    It is a contradiction. I can use an automaton on bst, specialize that SE.
    (0)
    Last edited by WoW; 07-27-2014 at 02:36 PM.