Results -9 to 0 of 18

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Player predatory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    280
    Character
    Predatory
    World
    Bahamut
    Main Class
    RNG Lv 99
    To suggest SE should make two games and have the player that like the one game to the other game and say hey why don't you do this like they do over in the WoW clone and not expect resistance seems kind of absurd. These are TWO SEPERATE games, if you like playing one, then play it, if you like playing the other, then by all means play it, but why should I have to play the other game if I want to enjoy this one?

    This whole thread is ridiculous in the first place just based on what the op said,

    1. The whole Idea behind handing a person a linkpearl is to make it more personal not detract from the sense of community, they started this game before WoW but have you ever gotten a ninja invite to a guild on WoW? Should SE rework how linkshells are handed out, just so somebody doesn't have to actually go pearl that person. I mean you can go almost anywhere in the game in a blink of the eye but you need to make it even easier than that? Shit how lazy can you get?

    2. Most LS's have an application process, it's usually done via a website like guildwork etc or they have their own personal website for their shell, so why should SE add a whole new part of the game for ls applications, unless we are talking about applying and being approved without an ls leaders approval which to me sounds like people sending ninja invites to others only in reverse

    3. If an ls is going to die because the leader leaves then let it die, if it's going to stay together it will, CAE stayed active on Ramuh long after Marky quit, (as long as the ls leader doesn't break the shell the sackholders can still make pearls and kick people), and DH reformed with the same name after Akabane was booted from the game. And even if the leader crushes the shell before he leaves one of the members can always remake the shell, this has been done time and again in this game. The permission system is the shellholder/sackholder system

    4. You can pearl every single player on a server if you want to, and they can all throw their pearls in their safe whatever, the thing is, there can only be 64 people in the shell at any given time, which given server sizes isn't really that big of a deal

    And don't bad talk me about quality of life improvements, I support those that actually make sense, (you can dig through my posts and go from there), but this one is just a they do it there let's do it here thing, and it makes absolutely no sense with the way this game was designed. If it was a let's make LS communities stronger by rewarding LS's whose members have spent X amount of time doing content over a period of a month then yes I could support that it would make more people want to become proactive on setting things up. And I would support a better drop rate for items if it's an all ls event, something like that, If you want them to rewrite the way ls's work ask for something cool
    (0)
    Last edited by predatory; 06-15-2014 at 07:25 PM.

Tags for this Thread