Quote Originally Posted by Blah View Post
No, I'm not wrong it's just not quantified so technically you get to "win" the argument which is why you decided to pick it in the 1st place.
It's not "not quantifiable", it's not real. Or rather, to be more scientific I should say: There is no evidence of it being real, and you haven't made an effort to find any such evidence either.

And yeah, I try (though admittedly I sometimes fail) not to pick arguments I don't think I can win. That's a bad thing?