Suggestions: Quality of Life Stuff and other suggestions

[Alhanelem]

(Or, at the very least, let people remove stuff from a wardrobe they're no longer subscribed to)

[radar]

Here is one: When Return to Home campaign is active, Please allow players who are returning for said campaign, to have access to their mog wardrobes (all that they had active the last time they had a sub). Half my gear is in mog wardrobe other than 1 & 2. So there goes my 99 gear that I had.

The free access isn't there so you can play for free every few months, it's there to get you to resub.

[Alhanelem]

The free access isn't there so you can play for free every few months, it's there to get you to resub.

Yes, but my point about not being able to remove your stuff is valid. If you don't need it / want to use it anymore, you should still be able to take stuff out of it, just not put stuff in or equip stuff from it. Currently if you cancel a wardrobe everything that's in it is held hostage until you pay for another month of it in order to remove your stuff from it.

[Zenion]

Yes, but my point about not being able to remove your stuff is valid. If you don't need it / want to use it anymore, you should still be able to take stuff out of it, just not put stuff in or equip stuff from it. Currently if you cancel a wardrobe everything that's in it is held hostage until you pay for another month of it in order to remove your stuff from it.

Aw, it's taken three years, but it sounds like I'm starting to rub off on you.

But if they're not subscribing, how are they supposed to move anything out of those wardrobes...?

Hey, fun idea. Instead of free complete access to all mog wardrobes during the free campaign, maybe it should just always be possible to take items out of a wardrobe whether it's subscribed or not; paying just enables putting things into the wardrobe, and equipping gear in it. There, now it doesn't feel like stuff's being held hostage during free play periods, but there's still a solid incentive to pay up for the extra space.

(This comes up every free play campaign, I think. It continues to be true. Items should never be trapped in wardrobes. It's just barely acceptable with mog lockers because those only require in-game currency, when real money is involved it crosses the line.)

[Alhanelem]

TBF mog lockers hardly cost anything, especially if you've spent any time grinding Locus Colibri. Mine is good for a literal century (earth time) and I have enough IS to book it for a millenium, no joke.

[Catmato]

The free access isn't there so you can play for free every few months, it's there to get you to resub.

But how is somebody supposed to see what new stuff the game has to offer if they can't do any of it because their gear is locked up?

[BobbinT]

Bumping up for no Linkshell chat loss, became much more important feats, & we're way past "PS2 limitations" since the game has been added contents that's already beyond PS2 capabilities since the closure for the ports.


Srsly, too sick to see loss chats everytime zoning too fast.


While at it, bump up unity chat access as well, as if choosing more popular unity punishes us to gain access to it. And yes, there are "other methods", but prefer have chat access all the time. My Yoran mostly on 3rd or 4th popular, but it's became more asinine to access chats especially after daily reset & can easily lose it whenever zoning.


We're living on times where social access becoming way much more basics, hence why things like discord becoming much more important for convenience. While delicate stuff like schedules runs relies on these, direct interaction for immediate topics sometimes are much needed with ingame chats.


Thus I humbly request for this to get higher priority. Thank you.

[Alhanelem]

Bumping up for no Linkshell chat loss, became much more important feats, & we're way past "PS2 limitations" since the game has been added contents that's already beyond PS2 capabilities since the closure for the ports.

Unfortunately this isn't correct, as there are many things they still can't do because it would basically require an engine rewrite- like changing the size or rate of transmission of network packets, officially supporting higher framerates, and many other things because of limitations in the way the game was designed. While technically changeable, it's not realistic because the game does not have the staff that it had during its original development. Yes, they're not bound by the limitations of the PS2 hardware, but they are (realistically) bound by the limitations of the game's programming itself. To change such things would require a substantial investment of both money and time.

In other words, "no ps2 limitations" doesn't mean "no limitations of any kind."

[BobbinT]

I assume this is for me, cmiiw...



Just a reminder, clicking on "view post" for some reason just spam on new tab & still didn't reveal post content of those on ignore list, unless I remove the names from list. Feel free to add my name on yours as well so that you don't have to bother seeing my "rants". Thank you.

[Alhanelem]

I still read posts unless I have reason to believe that it's spam or something being made in bad faith. You are in fact on my ignore list.

It's partially because there just isn't that much activity on here. The content of my post still stands, whether you personally choose to read it or not. It is for everyone, not just you.