possible oversight with the new ilvl system?

[Fermion]

Anywhere 150 or more magic accuracy will be needed, RDM won't be meleeing anyway.

In a highly buffed situation, DRK would lose tons of DoT casting spells.

In the case of PLD, flash is nothing more than a hate tool at this point.

When has BLU ever been invited for their magical blue magic in top tier content?

I see this as a good thing. Pure mages should always have an advantage in their respective forms of magic. That's the price DRKs, PLDs, BLUs or any melee/mage hybrid must pay for being hybrids.

[Stompa]

Anywhere 150 or more magic accuracy will be needed, RDM won't be meleeing anyway.

In a highly buffed situation, DRK would lose tons of DoT casting spells.

In the case of PLD, flash is nothing more than a hate tool at this point.

When has BLU ever been invited for their magical blue magic in top tier content?

I see this as a good thing. Pure mages should always have an advantage in their respective forms of magic. That's the price DRKs, PLDs, BLUs or any melee/mage hybrid must pay for being hybrids.

On the subject of PLD vs. pure mages, SE should give mages an A Rating in staves, and knock paladin from an A Rating to a B- rating. Its absurd that mage jobs who wield staves all day long every day, would realistically have a C rating while the only staff A goes to Paladin - a job whose primary requisite is the use of sword+shield which obviously can't be done with a staff. When SCH was released with the whole 'school of martial theory' and 'battlemage' type of fanfare, then SE gave SCH a C+ staff rating, completely dwarfed by the paladin's A rating despite the fact pld is a shield job. For extra bonus lols, paladin with their only staff A rating in the game, can not equip any empy or magian staves, while the jobs than can equip those staves have B~C ratings.
Re; macc I can see why DRK should get some added macc on a weapon, but its not as important as for the backline jobs.