It would have to be per rune per merit, if it is a straight +2 damage, which means +30 enhantment spell damage per swing, which seems unlikely, but possible. This would definately lean towards the sword > GS argument.
Most likely it will be single element only, unlike OFA. 15 MDB total, not ground breaking by any means.
Maybe it's just me, but I've often seen 50%/75% resists on Lunge.
This seems to work fine for me. Just be sure you're using the right rune element for the enfeeb you want to block. Eg fire runes to block para, not ice runes.
I can only agree. I've never found the damage on the enchantments, and the time lost from DoT to put up another 3 runes, to be worth using this JA.
I agree, if only it had a higher duration. But there's always the chance of relic+2 gear augments. ^^
Gambit lowers magic def, this lowers magic eva. The durations would need to be fairly long to use 1, get 3 more runes up, use the other, get 3 more runes up, then use Lunge.
SS can be useful if a mob is casting a long-cast-time spell (of element you're not prepared for) and it can't be stunned.
Again, yet another way that SE is saying "You don't get native dual-wield, shields, ToM or delve swords, but DW swords are much better for your job overall, so it's time to decide!"


Reply With Quote