For the record, total Empy count, not counting SE's insistence to include WoE weapons for some reason, including Ochain and Harp and not their useless base forms, is 75,932 as of a year ago, 2012 census. It's probably just over 100,000 by now. Again I thank SE in advance this year when they make me do this all over again instead of adding a Total count at the end of empy census.

Originally Posted by
Kincard
I'm asking again what you're trying to show other than something that is easily accessible on any community site.
Possibly that the lv95 empy trials are crap? Doesn't matter much why they are crap, just that they're crap, everyone knows it, and 0.83%ish of players have bothered to complete it. Mind you, over 16,000 relics exist and those aren't cheap. The question here is, why do people stop spending money when faced with a 95 empy trial? Probably for the same reason people stop spending money on their relics when it comes time for 99. It's fricking expensive!
I should probably see this years census before I start blabbering off here, but let's pretend it's still 2012. SE's idea that the 99 relic trial was designed for "many" or "most" or whatever wording they used. They actually envisioned that the majority of relic owners would upgrade their relics to 99 with ADL standing in the way. So it's pretty obvious why relic numbers are down when it comes to 99. That's okay because those players have already spent fortunes getting a relic period. No one can blame them for saying no to the 99 relic trial.
Now back to emps, why do people stop spending money on an ultimate/etc/etc type of weapon when it comes to those 1500 metal plates for emps? They hadn't spent a dime before that moment unless they paid someone to farm it for them. They are more pricey than relics by time you reach 99. It's possible that gil doesn't grow on trees for people as much as some people would like to believe. It's possible everyone who paid up for relics ran out of money for emps. Some also looked at the costs of taking these weapons to 99 and chose relic because 1)it cost less than emps 2)specific weapon was better than emp counterpart, like I did. Perhaps in the grand scheme of things, most people who own emps are casual players. They may play a lot, they may even take offense of being called casual, but they don't play hard enough to have hundreds of millions of gil or to spam end game content over and over to farm 1500 plates.
Perhaps these numbers show the difference between once wealthy players, current wealthy players who maintain their wealth and didn't spend it all on a 75 relic, and not so wealthy players. You've got the 90- emp crowd who has never upgraded to 95+. You've got the 95- relic crowd who never upgraded to 99. And you've got the 99 relic/95+ emp/entire mythic crowd who have spent a ton of gil. What this tells me is that to date there is still a very small percentage of players who can claim to be wealthy enough to afford things.
Overall, does this explain why 1% have taken the 1500 plate and beyond dive for their emp weapons? Maybe, maybe not. Maybe those that would have done it, decided that the 99 relic was better or significantly cheaper anyways, and on top of that they also may have mythic dreams and are spending a fortune on those. I don't feel 1500 metal plates are 100% stopping us from completing the 95 trial. It's the fact that the alternative weapon choices are on par or better on the way to 99, and cheaper. Perhaps that's enough to lower the plate count down to 1000 or even 500, but you can bet that in the end you still won't get 99 because people will just raise prices on the final item needed to make up for it as demand increases. People will still do the math and relics will still be their best option.
So, the short short answer is, 1% of people own a 95+ empy because most people can't see spending a fortune on minor upgrades to 99 when most of the awesome came for free up to 90. Relics and mythics on the other hand, you must spend a fortune to obtain them at all. And given the choice, you're gonna take relics to 99 long before you'll take emps to 95+. What does that mean for emps not at 99 for inc RME99 upgrades to match delve? Well, I guess it means those weapons are doomed, or you have a new found reason to spend money to get RMEs to 99 so they stay relevant with upgrades to match delve weaps. A 90 ukon will no longer be "good enough" For those that don't spend money, delve and WS unlocks is your answer. That is why they exist, I feel. So you replace your sub 99 emp with delve weapons. Look at it this way: At least you don't have to farm fricking 175 drops from high end NMs that may or may not be low man friendly, having to go out and constantly farm cruor so you can brew your way to emps. Granted, it's a pretty big mess right now with the whole SoA business, but find a way through it and obtaining new delve weapons will be well worth it.
You know, adjustments for at least emps may be justified simply because they are a lost cause, currently. Delve weaps have changed everything. You can no longer look at emps and say, their 95-99 trials are justified, because delve weapons are right there next to them saying hi. Do we view delve weapons as free weapons? Or do we accept that they can be very pricey like RMEs and the term becomes 'RMEDs'? Maybe pricey right now but maybe not later. I'm not sure. But if delve weapons become the standard and everyone owns one, I see no reason not to severely cut the requirements for emp trials. Maybe it won't be fair to relics and mythics, but delve already crossed that line, and they are much easier to get to 99 than emps due to cost. 95 relic vs 90 emp. Will I spend 60 mil on relic or like hundreds of millions on emp? Mandau vs twashtar. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Tough choice.
Say what you want but face it, emps are dead in the water now. At least with mythics there's a reason to still go through with them. I can't think of a single reason to bother with emps beyond lv90 or ochain. shrug