Results 1 to 10 of 772

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Alhanelem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bastok
    Posts
    11,014
    Character
    Tahngarthor
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    SMN Lv 99
    You should've figured that out when Square-Enix banned most of the prominent players
    Nice try, troll, but no, SE did not ban "most of the prominent players." They only banned most of the prominent *cheaters.* Any person could have seen the treasure pool duping had to be a bug, not intended and should not have done it, and exploiting bugs was clearly mentioned in the terms of service. Those people deserved to be banned. Despite this, those people do not represent "the majority of prominent players.

    Not that this has any real relevance to the topic, but since you brought it up....

    NO! it is not the same. and you are not understanding.
    I didn't say it was the SAME. I said it was similar. "Like" does not mean "the same." I fully understand it.

    only reason to do dyna NOW is for relic weapon currecy,
    You keep saying this, but you fail to provide a good reason why this is a problem. You're forgetting. Dynamis is for 18 people max now. People are going to do this in small groups of friends who want to help their friends, not by giant linkshells that sponsor runs and recruit "free labor."

    The metagame of dynamis will change. The peopel doing it will change. And there's no problem with it.
    (0)
    Last edited by Alhanelem; 03-31-2011 at 05:21 AM.

  2. #2
    Player Rambus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Windurst
    Posts
    1,561
    Character
    Rambus
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    BRD Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
    Nice try, troll, but no, SE did not ban "most of the prominent players." They only banned most of the prominent *cheaters.* Any person could have seen the treasure pool duping had to be a bug, not intended and should not have done it, and exploiting bugs was clearly mentioned in the terms of service. Those people deserved to be banned. Despite this, those people do not represent "the majority of prominent players.

    Not that this has any real relevance to the topic, but since you brought it up....
    that is not true
    (1)
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate View Post
    Spending Gil = Game balance, next question please tia
    Quote Originally Posted by Babekeke View Post
    They're reading and agreeing that these are very good ideas.... to be implemented to rune fencer.

    Just like any good suggestions in the RDM thread get applied to SCH.

  3. #3
    Player Rambus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Windurst
    Posts
    1,561
    Character
    Rambus
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    BRD Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
    I didn't say it was the SAME. I said it was similar. "Like" does not mean "the same." I fully understand it.
    sorry I did not use your word. they are not similar.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
    You keep saying this, but you fail to provide a good reason why this is a problem. You're forgetting. Dynamis is for 18 people max now. People are going to do this in small groups of friends who want to help their friends, not by giant linkshells that sponsor runs and recruit "free labor."

    The metagame of dynamis will change. The peopel doing it will change. And there's no problem with it.
    are you joking? people will NOT DO THE EVENT! I answered such a question, and mythic content is in the same boat

    LS did nto recruit free labor, dyna in the past was something to do, and people got relic amor out of it. now people do not want to do dyna because of abyssea.

    THAT is the main ISSUE and this change will not fix that.
    (0)
    Last edited by Rambus; 03-31-2011 at 05:43 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate View Post
    Spending Gil = Game balance, next question please tia
    Quote Originally Posted by Babekeke View Post
    They're reading and agreeing that these are very good ideas.... to be implemented to rune fencer.

    Just like any good suggestions in the RDM thread get applied to SCH.

  4. #4
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bastok
    Posts
    412
    Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
    Nice try, troll, but no, SE did not ban "most of the prominent players." They only banned most of the prominent *cheaters.* Any person could have seen the treasure pool duping had to be a bug, not intended and should not have done it, and exploiting bugs was clearly mentioned in the terms of service. Those people deserved to be banned. Despite this, those people do not represent "the majority of prominent players.
    For the most part, the two concepts became equivalent, especially the longer bots, Windower, and illegal programs and exploits became the means to become prominent.

    By the time the Salvage bans became in force, the only reason any prominent player was able to stick around was either a restarted character or a deliberate turn of the back by Square-Enix (Anyone remember the illegal first kills on Pandy Warden??)...
    (0)