Results 1 to 10 of 772

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. 04-02-2011 01:54 AM #1
    Alhanelem
    Player Alhanelem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bastok
    Posts
    11,268
    Character
    Tahngarthor
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    SMN Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Rambus View Post
    It is unreasonable to change dnya and not do anything to it. Then it is a waste of time.

    If there is no more notes to dyna changes then these changes are a waste of time.
    It is unreasonable to raise the level of the mobs when the equipment you're getting is designed for people in the 70s. The content still needs to be able to be done by those people, even if a majority of people are going to be higher.
    (2)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-02-2011 05:24 AM #2
    Rambus
    Player Rambus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Windurst
    Posts
    1,561
    Character
    Rambus
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    BRD Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
    It is unreasonable to raise the level of the mobs when the equipment you're getting is designed for people in the 70s. The content still needs to be able to be done by those people, even if a majority of people are going to be higher.
    it is not made for people in thier 70's it is ether crap or still used at 90.

    why should there be 75 content when ytou level so fast?

    waiste of data (ps2 limtations)

    level label on gear is meaningless, game is stuck on rules ment for 75 anyway. there is no endgame or real 90 content.

    FFXI is not like other games the "progress" is different.
    (0)
    Last edited by Rambus; 04-02-2011 at 05:28 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate View Post
    Spending Gil = Game balance, next question please tia
    Quote Originally Posted by Babekeke View Post
    They're reading and agreeing that these are very good ideas.... to be implemented to rune fencer.

    Just like any good suggestions in the RDM thread get applied to SCH.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »