I did, on page 2 when I backpedaled, but it didn't survive an edit I made. My apologies. Looking back now, I can see why, with that missing, it looked like I was arguing with myself.
On page 1 I was against decreasing damage enmity - but only because it would interfere with the unnecessary enmity shift suggestions I was making at the time. On page 2, I scrapped all that, simplified it, and there was supposed to be a 3 1/2 sentence bit about that.
Oh well. I won't ninja edit it now, but it's there - in spirit.
Let me summarize up to this point what the most current form of my "cure" consists of, and drop the snarky attitude while I do it, so that I stop coming off as a cocky mad scientist douchehat:
General Battle Mechanics
-Reduce enmity generation from damage dealt
-Increase enmity generation from cures
-Increase enmity loss from damage received
-Adjust the damage and/or radius of lethal AOE
OR
-Adjust mob AI/behavior regarding the use of lethal AOE so that it has a logical pattern
-With above, increase NM "Readies" delay on their powerful signature moves
-Stop making mobs cause multiple status effects with 1 move or that are immune to most debuffs
-Not yet mentioned in this thread, but I don't think quite so many NMs/bosses need Dispelga spells/TP moves..
PLD Specific
-Addition of Job Abilities/Traits to enhance cover in a meaningful way (something along the lines of meat blocking everyone in alliance behind him while increasing his shield block rate)
-Remove Fealty/Chivalry as merit abilities and make them normal job abilities, with their recast and the recast of Cover reduced
-For the first freed up empty merit slot, use as a trait or ability that increase the effectiveness of Cover, or gives a -damage taken trait
-For the second freed up empty merit slot, allow to increase the damage multiplier of Atonement (in very small increments per upgrade obviously)
-Allow Shield and Cover a chance to block Physical AOE TP moves (was going to get to this but got caught up in gaming 101)
-Give PLD an aura that increases MDB (not -MDT) (was also going to cover this before I let myself get derailed)
That is the most current version of what I am proposing. Again, apologies for my blunder on page 2, which kinda caused the whole thread to move southward.. although Saevel seemed to be chomping at the bit looking for an argument!


Reply With Quote