Results -9 to 0 of 65

Threaded View

  1. #27
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by saevel View Post
    Which dSTAT would be used for the physical WS then? STR, DEX, INT, MND? And if the WS has multiple WSC's which would be used?

    EX: Tachi Koki is a physical WS with additional light magic damage. The magic component is resistible and subject to magic accuracy. The WS use's both MND and STR as it's WSC's, so which would be used for "MACC"? Would it use INT because it's magic, or MND because it's light magic? There has been no proof in all of FFXI that any stat effects magic accuracy of physical weaponskills with an additional effect component.

    Seeing as brew adds MAB, Attack and accuracy, I'd say it was a VERY good assumption that it also adds MACC.
    If dSTAT exists, which stat affects the magic accuracy of these spells:
    No testing has occurred to differentiate, so if one exists, there isn't enough data to show which stat affects magic accuracy. Technically, BLU magical nukes can use multiple WSC, so are you suggesting dSTAT doesn't affect those as well?

    There is no proof that any stat affects mACC of physical weaponskills/BLU physical spells (Added this piece since we're discussing BLU results):
    No evidence exists for brews adding magic accuracy either. If brew has no mACC component, these tests prove the existence of dSTAT. If brew has mACC, this test doesn't disprove that, but doesn't prove the case either.

    Thus, that is why I asked if you had a test for brew mACC. We cannot "conclude" much from these results without that component. What we can say is that either brew includes mACC or that dSTAT affects these spells.

    The difference in MA between 65 and 99 is a few times greater then the +35 you were claiming. That +35 would be 17.5% on first land rate, and that's on things with a clear dstat magic accuracy (Magic WS and Spells).
    I never claimed +35 mACC, so you're not doing much with your test other than making the statement:
    Quote Originally Posted by saevel View Post
    Right now what I keep seeing is people complaining because some minor spell is sh1t and they want all 100+ Blue Magic spells to be useful and functional. I'm sorry but that's OP, if everyone BLU had worked "the way it should" then SE would nerf the sh1t out of this job.
    Quite laughable. As stated earlier,

    Saeval and SE:
    "Land accuracy reduction on a mob you're 35 levels higher than? Why that's absurd!"

    Anyways, jokes aside, I landed 5/6 (roughly) with cruor buffs, which is much more than you're reporting. Neither are great samples though.
    (3)
    Last edited by Yugl; 12-16-2012 at 05:03 AM.