Something strange in dynamis, possible 3rd party tool?

[Kincard]

You obviously don't play any job other than BST if you think that proccing a non-engaged mob won't increase your coin yield. (Assuming nobody's around to jack the monster)

BST is the only job that can not get "wasted" JA cooldown time at no risk because they can just snarl and run to the next monster.

[Caketime]

You obviously don't play any job other than BST if you think that proccing a non-engaged mob won't increase your coin yield. (Assuming nobody's around to jack the monster)

Assuming nobody around is silly, stop being a silly munchkin.

[Kincard]

That's funny considering how you've said in other posts that you don't have problems with overcrowding. I guess it's only overcrowded when it's convenient for your argument.

I've run into a few runs when there's nobody around EPs, but you have to be logged in on a totally dead hour like 12 PM PST on a weekday or something. Even then.

So basically you might run into it when you get a day off work!

[Caketime]

I don't have problems with overcrowding, you're assuming again. I don't have a problem with sharing either, which is what I was trying to imply.

[Kincard]

Sure, that's admirable and all...except what does you being nice have anything to do with every non-BST job getting higher coin yields if they could proc non-engaged mobs given the chance to do so?

[Caketime]

Nothing at all, but the fact that it's possible doesn't necessarily mean that it should be done at every opportunity.

[Vicious]

The correct pace is:

>build tp until proc on current target
>kill current target
>move onto next target
>repeat

The point is to use the 20 seconds of terror to your advantage. Anybody should be able to kill an EP solo, or a DC duo, before the terror wears off, which means you completely shut down enemy tp moves.

Less enemy tp moves = less tp spent on waltzes = more damage = faster kills = faster repops = more kills per window = more currency per run.

If there's a secret to farming Dynamis efficiently, that's probably it.