Yeah, because you can't heal or nuke anymore, and chainstun isn't a thing once some real content floats back around. And if you really want to play with that sword, the relic/mythic/empyreans are there waiting for you.
How about something that can cast death?
I won't be surprised if Dark Knights pick it up at 99. As is Summoners basically can via Odin.
You're REALLY still calling DRK emo in the year 2011? Is it really that hard to have an original thought or get over a joke that was never funny?
Anyhow, I'd agree that I don't want Necromancer in over jobs that aren't in yet and have important legacies in the franchise.
Last edited by Coldbrand; 03-19-2011 at 02:06 PM.
Under that logic, so many jobs should be removed from the game because they share something in common with another job such as Dancer, using daggers, so does a thief. Dancer, dual wields, like a ninja. Let me escalate the difference between beastmaster and necromancer. Beastmaster is solely melee based. Necromancer would be magic based and have mp. Seriously, you are merely making assumptions about what it would actually be like. There are many ways in which Necromancer could be completely different from Beastmaster, whilst still being able to control another creature.
|
|
© SQUARE ENIX FINAL FANTASY, SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks of Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. Vana'diel , Tetra Master, PLAYONLINE, the PLAYONLINE logo, Rise of the Zilart, Chains of Promathia, Treasures of Aht Urhgan, and Wings of the Goddess are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. The rating icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Online play requires internet connection. |