Unaugmented AF2+2 Storage

[Zirael]

I enjoyed reading your reasoning, Demon6324236. Well laid out.

[Demon6324236]

Today we got another twist to something we asked for.

Greetings!

The exchange rate will be around 100 cruor or so for each Crystal Petrifact traded. The plan is make the method of exchanging simple by using Voidwatch Officers, Planar Rifts, and such, and we will also make it possible to exchange multiple stacks at one time.

Rather than removing the pointless Crystal Petrifact system, they are giving us cruor, at 1st this didn't seem so bad, but at 100 cruor per petrifact you are looking at about 259.5 gil for each, rather than the 2~5k from ore, ingots, and logs, which would drop in their place instead. Not that I like logs/ores, but at least it was better than this, and allowed us to put more materials into circulation, and prevent more gil coming into circulation via blinker runs, which we know is exactly what this cruor will end up going to.

Guess I shouldn't be surprised though, just like with VW drops in the 1st place, they choose to twist our wants to fit their own desires and even make it more complex then it has to be in order to fix problems, or rather, put work into making problems slightly less shitty.

[Trisscar]

I would actually prefer if they add a storage slip for relic+2 non augment over them uncapping merits.

I would support both. Because there's no reason why the merits should be as they are now, and there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to store non augment AF2.

[Demon6324236]

Today we see yet another twist. We ask for them to ban more RMT, make a level limit on choco blinkers, or something to this effect. Instead the NPC price went from 519, to 67. This makes it harder for them to find & remove RMT, will cause the RMT to move, make it harder for players to earn money themselves, and has made the players angry. All in all a terrible twist on what we asked for that hurts just about everyone I think, just another show of not doing what the players ask imo.

[Demon6324236]

Btw, I'm now using this thread as my way of pointing out things I see SE do that I disagree with & explaining how I think they went wrong with it, mainly via twisting player requests, or doing things wrong with content & how they make it. Welcome to thoughts though.