Aftermath Proc Rate

[Protey]

Well, when we're discussing aftermath procs, why would anything that does not give an aftermath proc be relevant to discussion?

That would be from previous post where i had stated that the discussion had changed from aftermath proc to single wielding.

No wonder you like him so much.

not into guys. not into sluts like the one in Radio's sig either.

[Radio]

That would be from previous post where i had stated that the discussion had changed from aftermath proc to single wielding.



not into guys. not into sluts like the one in Radio's sig either.

Hey now, let's leave Beyoncé out of this!

Let us proc on both hands and feet. That would be ideal for me.

[Cream_Soda]

I'll rephrase from earlier.

If vereth procced on both hands, single wield emps would be the only ones not getting 100% of the time, because in 95%+ of practical situations, they will be dual wielding and will not have the option to offhand another empy in its place.

not into guys. not into sluts like the one in Radio's sig either.

No need to be modest

[Protey]

wouldn't you normally be offhanding a tp weapon so it wouldn't even matter?

[Cream_Soda]

K nvm. I misread that. I get what you're saying.

That's my point, if you're offhanding a weapon, that weapon isn't going to get double damage.

Giving vereth double damage procs on both hands would leave dual wielders as the only ones not able to get procs on all of their attacks.

[Radio]

K nvm. I misread that. I get what you're saying.

That's my point, if you're offhanding a weapon, that weapon isn't going to get double damage.

Giving vereth double damage procs on both hands would leave dual wielders as the only ones not able to get procs on all of their attacks.

And I'm fine with that. Although we'd still be unable to proc on kicks which means we still wouldn't be able to proc on all our attacks either.

[Cream_Soda]

And I'm fine with that. Although we'd still be unable to proc on kicks which means we still wouldn't be able to proc on all our attacks either.

I'd be fine with it too. I'm just saying that it's most likely the reason it is the way it is and not that it's a bug, but that it was specifically programmed this way.

[Protey]

Giving vereth double damage procs on both hands would leave dual wielders as the only ones not able to get procs on all of their attacks.

i think they would prefer it with only getting on empyrian, imagine if they used a multihit weapon as offhand and so got most of their procs on a weak weapon instead of the empyrian, that would suck.

[Cream_Soda]

i think they would prefer it with only getting on empyrian, imagine if they used a multihit weapon as offhand and so got most of their procs on a weak weapon instead of the empyrian, that would suck.

And it would be broken in comparison if h2h got it to proc on main/offhand and them only in mainhand.

Which is why it is the way it is now.


Also, lol at them preferring only emp. "Oh hey, I prefer to have the option that is going to deal less damage and give me 0 benefit in exchange".

[Protey]

Also, lol at them preferring only emp. "Oh hey, I prefer to have the option that is going to deal less damage and give me 0 benefit in exchange".

Think about it, if you're procing more on the offhand weapon instead of the empyrian, you'd be doing less damage.