Results 1 to 10 of 31

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Kristal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,552
    Character
    Kristal
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    PUP Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Godofgods View Post
    Aside from the fact that (in part) it doesnt matter what you feel, it matters what your player base feels, How about this?

    System currently has 20 books, with 10 pages in each book. So take one page off each book. Well find a way to survive with only 9 pages.
    That gives you 20 extra pages. Make 2 more books with 9-10 pages each.
    Now we have 22 book, and the total macro number stays the same. That gives players what they are asking for. And it fits completely in with you counter argument.
    Except that would probably cause pages to move to the wrong job books... Book 1 page 10 would suddenly become Book 2 page 1, Book 2 page 10 becomes Book 3 page 2, etc... My PUP macros would end up on my WHM macro book...
    Not to mention you lose 2 entire pages.

    Just have PUP and MNK take 5 pages in 1 book, and WHM and SCH take 5 pages in another, and you got room for 2 more jobs.
    (0)
    "Puppetmaster was our last best hope for peace. It failed.
    Now it's our last best hope.. for victory!"

  2. #2
    Player Godofgods's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    711
    Character
    Godofgods
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    DRK Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Kristal View Post
    Except that would probably cause pages to move to the wrong job books... Book 1 page 10 would suddenly become Book 2 page 1, Book 2 page 10 becomes Book 3 page 2, etc... My PUP macros would end up on my WHM macro book...
    Not to mention you lose 2 entire pages.

    Just have PUP and MNK take 5 pages in 1 book, and WHM and SCH take 5 pages in another, and you got room for 2 more jobs.
    I never said it was a perfect solution. But seeing as the devs reason for not adding two new books was merly a 'we dont think its needed' ... i figured a logical argument was out of the question.
    (0)