So what is the verdict on the Magian magic damage affinity staves? Do I still have to make all 7 of them(there is no way I'm making a staff just for luminohelix/banish)?
Even if the answer is yes, Chatoyant will save me a good amount of space, since I've been keeping the HQ level 51 staves around just for the extra m.acc. that is missing from the magic damage affinity staves.
EDIT: As for Sotek's idea that the staff would allow SCH to use one weapon full-time, I had high hopes for the idea, but then I remembered that I have a Kirin's Pole for enhancing magic, which I cast often, regardless of what I'm doing.
To add to that, I do lots of solo work. It's the only time I get to do much other than spam embrava or magic procs, and in those situations, I can't live without the -20% Physical damage taken from my earth staff.
Phalanx, Regen V, and Earth/Terra's Staff are a godsend when it comes to keeping me alive in solo situations.
Last edited by Eric; 07-27-2012 at 07:12 AM.
Can I ask which 4? I'm thinking Thunder, Ice, Dark, and what's the last element?
EDIT: What about obis?
This staff is great for when macc matters outside that Trail staffs are better
I will still use Tefnut and Genbu's sheild for curing
Main : 99 DRK
Subs : 99 SMN COR SCH MELEEWHM
Server : Ragnarök
Relics : 95 Ragnarok and 95 Apoc
Ironic that when i was young i never had enough video games but now i have too many and not enough time to play them.
Is this what passes as testing what gear is better now? Make everything equal, but give one set an extra 10% boost? Of course Chatoyant is going to beat Arka IV if you do it that way. A proper Arka IV set lets you trade away some of that cure potency gear for +Skill/MND gear:
Arka IV
http://www.ffxiah.com/item-sets/266982
Chatoyant Staff (uses the head slot to reach 50% CP, so you must choose between Savant's Bonnet and Iaso for Rapture)
http://www.ffxiah.com/item-sets/267318
I'm not saying Chatoyant loses to Arka IV when you do proper set comparisons, it may still win. I'm just saying that you're dishonest with the numbers you've presented. That's rather dangerous when there are people will see it and believe Chatoyant is always better in every situation.
The other reality is that most people aren't going to have access to delicious items like Iaso Mitra and Nares Trews. A 50% CP set is by far easier to build with Arka IV than Chatoyant.
In the year that I was gone, SCH went from a job no one wanted to a job that gets to use their 2-hour and go sit in the corner. I guess that's progress?
It was mostly to show the amount of difference in curing you would see, not to show that chatoyant is always better. Everyone can reach 50% cure potency in abyssea / voidwatch without nares and iaso mitra by using atmas or atmacites (You only need 30% in Abyssea and 35% in Voidwatch). Someone has pointed out that 39% cure potency is the magic number on ffxiah where chatoyant pulls ahead. The highest I believe you can naturally attain without paean or iaso mitra is 43% and the highest without nares or mitra is 40% (using selenian cap).
|
|
© SQUARE ENIX FINAL FANTASY, SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks of Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. Vana'diel , Tetra Master, PLAYONLINE, the PLAYONLINE logo, Rise of the Zilart, Chains of Promathia, Treasures of Aht Urhgan, and Wings of the Goddess are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. The rating icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Online play requires internet connection. |