[Suggestion] Consolidating Equip Macros

[tyrantsyn]

I'm confused, I thought we were discussion increasing macro line's. Are we all getting into selling crack on the street's of Jeuno now or something? Man I've never seen a strung out taru before, this is going to be great.

[FrankReynolds]

I'm confused, I thought we were discussion increasing macro line's. Are we all getting into selling crack on the street's of Jeuno now or something? Man I've never seen a strung out taru before, this is going to be great.

They look like this. They have been all over Jeuno lately.

do you think if players had infinitely long macros they would que hundreds of actions onto one button press and just leave it alone during battles?

I admit that I didn't look very hard, but I have yet to find a spellcast script in pastebin that performs repeated actions. It is probably doable, but I've never met anyone personally who uses it for that.

[Jackstin]

Its a fallacy to say an argument is flawed because the arguer is uncredable either you are attacking my argument, in which case you are doing it wrong, or you are attacking me, in which case there is no need.

I personally think it is unfair to call me worse than a cheater. If I was intentionally partying with people, making use of their cheating, but refusing to put my account at risk, then sure I could understand it. But I don't. I party with them despite their cheating, not because of it. Try and be a little nicer on the internet, calling a stranger who you know next to nothing about a hypocrite is not a nice thing to do.

[cidbahamut]

Try and be a little nicer on the internet, calling a stranger who you know next to nothing about a hypocrite is not a nice thing to do.

[FrankReynolds]

Its a fallacy to say an argument is flawed because the arguer is uncredable either you are attacking my argument, in which case you are doing it wrong, or you are attacking me, in which case there is no need.

I personally think it is unfair to call me worse than a cheater. If I was intentionally partying with people, making use of their cheating, but refusing to put my account at risk, then sure I could understand it. But I don't. I party with them despite their cheating, not because of it. Try and be a little nicer on the internet, calling a stranger who you know next to nothing about a hypocrite is not a nice thing to do.

According to your arguments about spellcast, I deduce that you think it makes people perform much better than they would without it. Which means that your LS would not be nearly as good without it. Which means that by extension, you did in fact choose your LS based on their use of it.

You could say people are personally attacking you, but that is only because you have used yourself in your argument. If you had said "joey the smurf is in an LS with cheaters because it's unavoidable", we would all be talking about what a hypocrite Joey the Smurf is right now.

As an aside, if everyone is using spellcast, and it is completely unavoidable to participate without teaming up with spellcast users, then who exactly is being harmed by it? It sounds like everyone is on equal footing. I find that very hard to believe by the way. I have been in numerous LS where almost everyone played on 360 and we frequently used xbox live chat during events. I found the linkshells completely by accident. It has never occurred to me to ask people what system they play on in game, without the topic coming up due to game crash issues, or chat features (IE "does anyone here use vent? or xbox live?").