[Suggestion] Consolidating Equip Macros

[Zerich]

which part of my post according to MUDs isnt possible?

read rosa's posts.

[Trumpy]

i did, still not seein what it had to do with my quoted post or FFXI as it isnt a MUD?

[Zerich]

i did, still not seein what it had to do with my quoted post or FFXI as it isnt a MUD?

but according to them, that's one of the reasons that gear swapping is cheating, since apparently that wasn;t present in them.

(sarcasm)

[Trumpy]

is ur MUD post something actually on topic? i can see how it would relate to suggestion number 1 if i am understandin Rosas post clearly, but for suggestion 2 it wouldnt apply.

Seems to me the way #2 would work is youd have a separate menu that had gear sets (similiar to your equip screen) and you name said sets. and then reference them in one command by name. /equip set TP

[Zerich]

is ur MUD post something actually on topic? i can see how it would relate to suggestion number 1 if i am understandin Rosas post clearly, but for suggestion 2 it wouldnt apply.

Seems to me the way #2 would work is youd have a separate menu that had gear sets (similiar to your equip screen) and you name said sets. and then reference them in one command by name. /equip set TP

Everything that was to be said about the main topic was basically already said. The last 10ish pages has just been irrelevance.

[Trumpy]

If anyone where played an MUD.. you can't streamline ,acros like you guys think you can. And the more lines you put the more automated it does get.

i read that as you cant put a bunch of commands in one line like /equip body hands legs ect ect in one line.

also ffxi wasnt originally a MUD either. unlike how gear swaps may have been originally unintended or ninja not a tank originally intended but eventually accepted in this same game. (i do see ur /sarcasm thing tho)

[Trumpy]

agreed. and it was also the last 10 pages that everyone involved should have had cooler heads about them and jsut stopped (10 pages ago)

[Trumpy]

speaking of ways things are read or interpreted and off topicness:

about runic fencer, (i know we know nothing concrete) they said they would use runes to do things. did they (as in SE) actually say runes would be consumable items (like ninja tools)? I was out of town and everything i read when i had pc access just said they used runes. yet for a while every single post about it i read seemed to believe they were consumable items. I may have missed a few sources of info there. Id like to hope its more of a charge system like SCH has on strategms as we already have a consumable item tank and dont need another one even if it works differently.

Just checkin if i missed something there

[Trumpy]

yea SE responce didnt seem to concern any of the discussion we were having. maybe a couple posts mentioned linkin macros to summon other macros somehow, so that was the responce we got, nevermind the 100 posts about simply swaping more gears with one macro than we can currently

[Iakothm]

yea SE responce didnt seem to concern any of the discussion we were having. maybe a couple posts mentioned linkin macros to summon other macros somehow, so that was the responce we got, nevermind the 100 posts about simply swaping more gears with one macro than we can currently

uhh what are you talking about?

Hey guys,

I just wanted to let you know that we understand everyone's viewpoints as to why swapping additional gear via macros would be favorable, and to some, it may not.

The following policies were established from the beginning after thoroughly exploring the macro feature:

1. The fundamental rule is that macros execute one action per line. (Excluding “/wait”)
2. It is not possible to automate things nor call other macros within a macro.

Due to the aforementioned reasons, we do not plan to expand macros and we appreciate your understanding.

This clearly states its not gonna happen both of them.