Consider rare triggers for dbox players...

[Oakrest]

to suggest that taking "Rare" off of certain items will enhance anything is ignorant: if you can collect multiple items on a single character, so can they....

Your missing the point entirely - currently single boxers can't collect multiple rares as dual boxers can. If they make a change to balance what I'm suggesting, who cares if dualboxers can store multiple items STILL - they already can.

I guess this point is just beyond some people, or maybe it's just 'ignorance' as you suggest.

This game wasn't built for soloing. This game wasn't built for dual-boxers.

Agreed on both, but those are two completely different things. All I'm saying is the game 'should' be built for single-boxers, not dboxers.

Context is so easily driven to shit on these forums.

[Muse]

Agreed on both, but those are two completely different things. All I'm saying is the game 'should' be built for single-boxers, not dboxers.

Context is so easily driven to shit on these forums.

You are missing the point. This game SHOULD NOT be about soloing ONLY. You're still thinking you deserve more because you solo. Tough cookies, nobody cares. If you want to get more items bring more people, it has always been this way. This is a PARTY game, not a solo game. If you want to play a solo ONLY game follow these steps.

1: Leave your house
2: Go to a store
3: Buy a console
4: Buy a SINGLE PLAYER game
5: Go home and put it all together.

If you have steps 1-4 completed already go to step 6, uninstall all MMO's.

[Dazusu]

I'm simply trying to make a suggestion to balance a current opportunity available to dboxers that isn't to single boxers.

Balance? There will be no balancing here. Tanaka has left the building.

[Behemothx]

Logic fails here, whether or not you can hold more pops will directly affect dualboxers too.

[Reiterpallasch]

You are missing the point. This game SHOULD NOT be about soloing ONLY. You're still thinking you deserve more because you solo. Tough cookies, nobody cares. If you want to get more items bring more people, it has always been this way. This is a PARTY game, not a solo game. If you want to play a solo ONLY game follow these steps.

1: Leave your house
2: Go to a store
3: Buy a console
4: Buy a SINGLE PLAYER game
5: Go home and put it all together.

If you have steps 1-4 completed already go to step 6, uninstall all MMO's.

Wow, butthurt much? I take it you're a baddie that can't solo things other people can? So bad that you didn't even read his post:

All I'm saying is the game 'should' be built for single-boxers, not dboxers.

He doesn't even say solo, he says "single-boxer", as in person controlling 1 character.

[Muse]

Wow, butthurt much? I take it you're a baddie that can't solo things other people can? So bad that you didn't even read his post:

He doesn't even say solo, he says "single-boxer", as in person controlling 1 character.

I solo all the time actually, which is why I think it is stupid to think this. Also he stated earlier he solo's and wants to hold more RARE tagged drops including sky pops. Can't read much?

However, the immediate problem I see with dboxing is that it allows the dboxer to receive multiple rare triggers. I think they should consider removing the 'rare' property from certain triggers to make it fair for solo players to get as much of a lucrative chance at multiple rare triggers as a dboxer. For example, sky triggers like the 'Gem of the North' can drop once or twice from a single NM, but you're only ever going to get to lot the one if you're playing solo. This might have made sense in olden days (although ironically two drops from sky NM's is relatively recent), and I'm not suggesting a complete revamp of sky, just a consideration that certain trigs should have their 'rare' property removed.

The more compelling argument could also be made, "get a friend you bridge troll - then you can have both drops cause you're friend will give you the second when you need it". And again, I'd say fair argument - but FFXI is different now, there are a lot of players who spend at least some of their time adventuring alone - and those guys are missing out on more lucrative drops that could spice up the journey..

Because I know you missed it, I quoted it and added it above.

[Oakrest]

This is really sad - many people are still confusing soloing with single-boxing. Massive distinction, I don't think this game should ever be a solo-game, that's not what i'm implying.. if I have, please point out the thread and I will adjust/ammend a note so that future readers will better understand.

Moreover, it's sadder that I had really positive and good intentions to benefit the community with this thread - and somehow you guys think this is about me. The reality is, I dlbox already, and I benefit the hell out of Zipacna dropping me two Gem of the North that I often turn into 4 Genbu seals. 99% of sky I solo on my PLD/RDM, and keep a dbox mule (or more) on hand to get the addititional rare drop. I spotted the apparent opprtunity to improve [read: balance] this for single-boxers, and obviously the community just doesn't want this game to improve. That's going to work out great, because SE generally doesn't want it to either based on their recent track record.

Enjoy, you wont see me back in this thread On to other more meaningful battles!

[Reiterpallasch]

Because I know you missed it, I quoted it and added it above.

Or because YOU missed it?

The reality is, I dlbox already, and I benefit the hell out of Zipacna dropping me two Gem of the North that I often turn into 4 Genbu seals

Seriously, how the fuck do people like you (Muse) know how to post on these forums, let alone remember to breath?

He didn't even say all triggers, just some. Do you know that some NMs can actually drop two of them? His idea would change those, and no, contrary to what you think, sky wouldn't suddenly be packed with people forcing you to wait your turn. See luls below:

This game is made for partying, so I don't see a reason for the RARE tag to removed from items. Imagine the RARE tag being removed, and you get those two pops. Pretty sweet huh? Now imagine you are in abyssea/sky/wherever.

You'll be waiting behind that ALLIANCE, PARTY, ETC even longer now as all of those people will have more then one pop guaranteed. With something like this, I could hold enough pop items until my inventory bursts and just spam pop a single NM, forcing others to have to fight for the pop spot with me.

[Llana_Virren]

He didn't even say all triggers, just some. Do you know that some NMs can actually drop two of them? His idea would change those, and no, contrary to what you think, sky wouldn't suddenly be packed with people forcing you to wait your turn. See luls below:

The logic in his argument, however, is not limited just to the sky drops that he was discussing. "Some" would undoubtedly turn into "more" because after a short while, you'd see similar posts arguing "If xxx pot item isn't rare, why is yyy?!"

His argument is flawed based on the reasoning he's using, and that won't change no matter how poorly or well you two argue semantics.