I'll be honest, I'm not going through all the older posts just to validate my point.
I'll be honest, I'm not going through all the older posts just to validate my point.
Last edited by Daniel_Hatcher; 04-27-2012 at 02:38 AM.
They actually have denied a LOT of UI changes, using limitations on the console platforms as the main concern. Even things that techically weren't a limitation of the console itself, but more the size of the screen on the consoles (what was it, 800 X 600 or soemthing on PS2) preventing them from doing some changes because of the lack of real estate on screen.
Such things are not an issue on systems that can go to full-blown HD resolution, and on PC's that have a VAST amount of resident memory to work with (one of the larger issues with consoles, if I remember right, PS2 doesn't even use it but streams data constantly). So, it's good to see that they are giving in and tweaking things more and more for the platforms that have the capability. Maybe they finally caught on to what all of us have been saying for a long time now....tweak the PC version to make it more attractive and people will be more inclined to move off the more restricitve platforms to the point they can just stop worrying about that legacy platform and everybody wins in the end.
{DISCLAIMER} Posts may contain opinions based on personal experiences that are not be meant to be taken as facts. What may appear as fact with no source reference may be recollection of information with no source, and may be subject to scrutiny without source reference. Any debate over validity of said facts without source references may be considered conjecture of all parties in that debate. Player comments may not be the expressed position/consent of SE, their affiliates, or any employees of said organizations. Please take these posts with a grain of salt if you are offended by the views of the player and understand that opinions are like assholes... everyone has one, not everyone wants to hear it.
All affirmations are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
FFXI: Leviathan > Arcon
FFXIV: Selbina > Arcon Villiers
there is nothing to confirm or deny if its multi chats or multi windows for logging in more than once, it is unclear, and it is mentioned separately from the multiple log windows, so those of you who are saying chat windows are assuming, perhaps a community rep can clear it up a bit for us
Try to have fun or it isn't worth playing
Beyond the fact that I don't see S-E allowing multiple simultaneous log-ins with a single account (see: no discount), the question of being allowed to run multiple simultaneous instances of FFXI on a PC is a red herring. Virtualizing a system capable of playing FFXI is trivial on a modern computer.
It doesn't matter if you have multiple FFXI windows open or multiple VirtualBox/Virtual PC windows open, the result is the same.
Try to have fun or it isn't worth playing
My interpretation remains that it will allow us to access inventory/chat logs/macro palettes/maps through separate windows, versus all in the main UI screen.
the adjustments sound great now if only the DEV would make it so that ppl can change jobs without having to run to a moghouse or nomad moogle this game would be more fun like FFXIV
|
© SQUARE ENIX FINAL FANTASY, SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks of Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. Vana'diel , Tetra Master, PLAYONLINE, the PLAYONLINE logo, Rise of the Zilart, Chains of Promathia, Treasures of Aht Urhgan, and Wings of the Goddess are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. The rating icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Online play requires internet connection. |