NIN combinations

[Neisan_Quetz]

Don't need /sch or /rdm in salvage. You can do that /thf on Whm. AoE buffs only applies to the pt that doesn't have a whm and most people bring at least 2 anyway... most of whm's native buffs are AoE anyway. AoE stoneskin is pretty redundant post cureskin changes, I can barely consider others worth AoEing. /Rdm is almost totally useless unless you need to dispel more often.

Don't need either sub to cap cure cast time as far as I can see.

[Behemothx]

Don't need /sch or /rdm in salvage. You can do that /thf on Whm. AoE buffs only applies to the pt that doesn't have a whm and most people bring at least 2 anyway... most of whm's native buffs are AoE anyway. AoE stoneskin is pretty redundant post cureskin changes, I can barely consider others worth AoEing. /Rdm is almost totally useless unless you need to dispel more often.

Don't need either sub to cap cure cast time as far as I can see.

Still, WHM/BLM today is pretty useless.

[Arcon]

Don't need /sch or /rdm in salvage.

No, but it's more efficient, which is pretty much what his sole priority seems to be.

AoE buffs only applies to the pt that doesn't have a whm and most people bring at least 2 anyway... most of whm's native buffs are AoE anyway.

Sneak/Invis applies to the current pt, and saves everyone having to bring sneak/invis tools/meds, which saves more inventory than warp slots. It also enables AoE cures to wake other parties in the alliance.

Don't need either sub to cap cure cast time as far as I can see.

I have no idea. I don't care much either. It saves having to bring even more gear to reduce casting/recast time, again all according to his sole argument, which is inventory.

Note, that this all is just to contradict some of the statements made, even if none of this was true, it still wouldn't mean anything. The main argument is that there is more than one way to do it.