Moogle egg

[Sarick]

We're clearly on opposite sides of a great wall. There's really no point in debating this.

Seeing as you don't have a good defense even after given excellent perceptions in great detail I can agree there is no point in debating this. We disagree, I want things to be more equal you want to hold things back. The effort I've made to move forward can more then defend itself at this point.

However, when they go as far as preparing in-game items, those, I think, should be available to everyone or no one. Now that would be fair I think (thinking of the annual in-game events gives a good idea of what I mean). Same goes with items obtained for participating in real-life events

For the most part I agree with this.

Either way, I am not sure what you two are debating on right now.

His side of the debate is extremely lax almost apathetic of the situation. It defies logic and makes me wonder why he even would want to defend his position. His argument makes the assumption that personal judgement of whats fair has no consequences. If there is no standardized method of making things equal as humanly possible there is no faith. Why?, because the guidelines he proposed as fair are based on personal perception. When these guidelines are handed over to multiple groups it's just human nature that one side is bound to be treated differently. From my perspective making them equal as possible is in the best interest of everyone.

It's simple to understand, If the personal variables aren't there then its obviously to be more equal. IMHO, it's backwards thinking when someone would defend an issue that can easily be abused like it already is. If no one defends this position then it promotes the right to unfairness.