Macro/Books/Pages.

[Arcon]

Naw looks to me that it's just you solo "Trying" to speak for everyone else. If you weren't so gungho about this a "Same thread", You wouldn't have to explain yourself which you are doing repeatably.

I hate leaving the last word to someone who's wrong, it gives the impression that I can't defend myself against them, which is untrue. I'm aware that that's a childish attitude and leads to several unnecessary arguments, but it's part of my OCD and I can't just ignore it.

One way or another there is a lot of threads that are the same and similar. By calling this thread pointless you've called everyone that took their time and effect in posting in it thus far pointless... rude much?

No, I called every repost except the first pointless. And it's not an insult to anyone, it's merely a fact, which is uncomfortable to some people (apparently you too, as you're not taking it well). I'm just stating that all their threads won't reach the devs, as it's already been posted and I doubt the reps are big into repeating themselves over and over, mainly because they already told us how it works. By pointing out that there's been other threads, it would make sense to find those and keep discussing things in there, to keep all the information in one thread and not scattered around ten different ones where no one could find relevant information if they're looking for it.

I've read a lot of those old threads and most of them talked about adding a new system to the previous macro's system, where this one just adds lines to be able to input more changes to said gear. Why not try not being a forum nazi? and add to the conversation... maybe you'll have something more intelligent to say.

I said plenty of intelligent things about it supporting this very cause in other threads. Repeating myself in here would do no good to anyone. You're just taking it personally that I told you that there's been threads about this very issue before, which you shouldn't have, because it wasn't.

And while there's many threads suggesting slightly different macro/gear things, some are actually exactly the same (none of which insist that 12 lines is somehow the sweet spot, though, which I admit I also find odd). There's also a reason for why most threads are suggesting something else, by the way, and it's precisely because people suspect that SE are either not gonna change it (may be related to PS2 issues, as macros are also stored in active memory, which we all know is painfully small on the PS2), or take too long mulling it over, so they come up with alternate solutions to the same problem. Some of which are pretty excellent, and which I'd prefer over more macro lines. Regardless, I support all of these threads fully and I liked every one of them, including yours.