Quote Originally Posted by Yinnyth View Post
But to me this is an extraordinary claim since I've never seen ADL split while stunned, and I've seen ADL split a lot more than I care to admit. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And if you don't have proof, it's best to use qualifier statements such as "I think" or "I believe" or "I don't have any proof to back this up, but this is how it seems to work" instead of just outright claiming your belief is fact.

Also, considering the trend of this thread and how much backpedaling he's done, you'd have a better understanding of the truth if you just automatically assume everything Pchan says is wrong. He spent about the first 10 or 20 pages claiming that ADL's first split is completely based on time. Now he's claiming ADL's triple split is based on Violent Rupture, that ADL doesn't split a second time 90% of the time, and that ADL can split while stunned. ALL of these are extraordinary claims. They ALL seem contrary to what other people observe. You need to bring proof, or you need to accept the possibility that you could be wrong.

Or just learn to enjoy being called out by every intelligent player on the forums. I get the feeling that might be the choice he's going with.

So after the entire mass of idiots, including you, were jumping at my throat for claiming I could 6-man ADL, wich I proved with 3 videos, you still split nonsense trying to belittle me ? Everyhting we claim about ADL is correct and you are wrong because you don't actually kill it. Shock squall has a fixed duration, tiered to full/half/quarter etc because this is FFXI, you don't have to prove it. Unresisted shock squall on ADL can last that much and ADL can cast and split while stunned, otherwise you would see all the gimps killing it in ally destroying it before it even has a chance to split (tp burn until 60% > schockquall > unleash all WS would instantly kill it). I've killed maybe 80 ADL at this time I know what I'm saying.