Stun's duration is chaotic at best. "It should be lasting 20 seconds, but it feels like he split earlier than that." is a far cry from proof that he can split while stunned. In order to prove something, you need to eliminate all other possibilities. Your claim still leaves room for human error and relies on an unverified statement that shock squall lasts ~20 seconds on ADL all the time.

Now if you had proof that shock squall never lasts under a certain amount of time, and you had a video of the fight with ADL splitting within that amount of time after shock squall, then yes, that would count as proof. But right now, it's conjecture.

Am I saying you're wrong about this? No. I accept that this might be a possibility because I don't have any proof to the contrary. But to me this is an extraordinary claim since I've never seen ADL split while stunned, and I've seen ADL split a lot more than I care to admit. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And if you don't have proof, it's best to use qualifier statements such as "I think" or "I believe" or "I don't have any proof to back this up, but this is how it seems to work" instead of just outright claiming your belief is fact.

Also, considering the trend of this thread and how much backpedaling he's done, you'd have a better understanding of the truth if you just automatically assume everything Pchan says is wrong. He spent about the first 10 or 20 pages claiming that ADL's first split is completely based on time. Now he's claiming ADL's triple split is based on Violent Rupture, that ADL doesn't split a second time 90% of the time, and that ADL can split while stunned. ALL of these are extraordinary claims. They ALL seem contrary to what other people observe. You need to bring proof, or you need to accept the possibility that you could be wrong.

Or just learn to enjoy being called out by every intelligent player on the forums. I get the feeling that might be the choice he's going with.